Teams

Moore

2023 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-25vs EstradaLost 01
L#2 DoublesSeth Davis / Kylie Gaskins vs Emily Trochimowicz / Xavier Estrada4-6, 5-4
2023-03-18vs IschLost 01
L#1 DoublesMeg Daniels / George Briscoe vs Roshni Fifadra / Scott A Green1-6, 3-6
2023-03-05vs DawsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesGeorge Briscoe / Meg Daniels vs Brian Timian / Jennifer Timian2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-02-24vs WalshWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Briscoe / Meg Daniels vs Erica Wahlig / Tom Walsh6-0, 6-2
2023-02-19vs IschLost 02
L#1 DoublesMeg Daniels / Tony Clark vs Sandra Julian / Andy Little4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKylie Gaskins / Ray Walls vs Roshni Fifadra / Ken Mitchell2-6, 3-6
2023-01-22vs IschWon 10
W#1 DoublesGeorge Briscoe / Meg Daniels vs Gail Martinez Waters / Andy Little6-4, 6-1
2023-01-08vs WalshLost 01
L#3 DoublesRay Walls / Kylie Gaskins vs Laura Lewandowski / Steven Hill7-6, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Casey Royster
published 3.5
3.30
Jade Moore
published
3.11
Denise Browne
published 3.5
3.05
George Briscoe
published
3.00
Kylie Gaskins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.98
Meg Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.57
Seth Davis
published
John Burns
published
Scott Womack
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Royster
192W–200L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Jade Moore
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Denise Browne
11W–23L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
George Briscoe
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Kylie Gaskins
140W–132L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Meg Daniels
79W–59L career · 9 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.98
Seth Davis
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.57
John Burns
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Womack
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.