Teams

KY/LOU/HARRIS/MASON

2025 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-23vs KY/LOU/COOMES/RILEYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Bethards / Abigail Scott vs Penny DeVenuto / Lindsey Graves7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMallory Caldwell vs Kim Riley6-3, 6-1
2025-11-01vs KY/LOU/MANGOLDLost 01
L#1 DoublesAbigail Scott / Jessica Bethards vs Sarah Gorman / Stephanie Metten5-7, 2-6
2025-10-12vs KY/LOU/STEEN/JORDENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSara Ruby / Abigail Scott vs Nikki Rutledge / Alexandra Deal4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMallory Caldwell vs Abigail Stewart6-4, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Mallory Caldwell
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Jennifer Solinger
published
3.18
Stephanie Mason
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.07
Amanda Reasor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.05
Abigail Scott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
2.94
Jessica Bethards
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Victoria Conway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.87
Sara Ruby
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.74
Alexandra Lamar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kim Orick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lynn Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Lisa Marsh
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth McIntyre
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Harris + Stephanie Mason5747% games+8.5% vs expected
Amanda Reasor + Jessica Bethards9456% games+8.4% vs expected
Kim Orick + Stephanie Mason123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mallory Caldwell
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Jennifer Solinger
5W–2L career · no lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.19
Stephanie Mason
31W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Amanda Reasor
12W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3.5
Abigail Scott
4W–11L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Jessica Bethards
18W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Victoria Conway
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
2.90
Sara Ruby
13W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Alexandra Lamar
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
Kim Orick
4W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Lynn Harris
9W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Lisa Marsh
9W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Elizabeth McIntyre
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.