Teams

Bohl - Columbia

2023 Columbia Adult 18 & Over League · 3.5 Adult Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSOURI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-26vs Brett/WilkinsonLost 23
L#1 DoublesLea Brandt / Regan Ubinas vs Erica Beshore / Oksana Cottone1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesVitalija Bechtold vs Gina Whorley6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCarolyn Spencer / Julia Norregaard vs Helen Anderson / Kathy Hodges5-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLauren Crosby vs Katie Wilkinson6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesReagan Brown / KEIRA HAMANN vs Hannah Holzum / Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi4-6, 4-6
2023-06-16vs Brett/WilkinsonWon 41
W#1 DoublesSarah Bohl / Lauren Crosby vs JESSICA Wade / Julie Klein6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Spencer vs Gina Whorley2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJulia Norregaard / Alicia Casady vs Leah Sirois / Helen Anderson6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKEIRA HAMANN vs Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Paetzold / Elizabeth Ball vs Allie Brett / Hannah Holzum3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-06-12vs Brett/WilkinsonWon 32
W#1 DoublesLea Brandt / Vitalija Bechtold vs Kathy Hodges / JESSICA Wade6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Ball vs Oksana Cottone2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJulia Norregaard / NICOLE Reynolds vs Allie Brett / Amy Susan7-6, 7-6
L#2 SinglesReagan Brown vs Katie Wilkinson4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKEIRA HAMANN / Sarah Paetzold vs Hannah Holzum / Stessie Millner6-2, 6-1
2023-06-05vs Brett/WilkinsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesSarah Bohl / Lea Brandt vs Kathy Hodges / Leah Sirois6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAlicia Casady vs Erica Beshore4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ball / Lauren Crosby vs Katie Wilkinson / Julie Klein6-2, 6-2
2023-06-01vs Brett/WilkinsonWon 40
W#1 DoublesSarah Bohl / Lauren Crosby vs Erica Beshore / Kathy Hodges6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLea Brandt vs Gina Whorley6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJulia Norregaard / Elizabeth Ball vs Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi / Amy Susan6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKEIRA HAMANN / Alicia Casady vs Hannah Holzum / Stessie Millner6-2, 6-4
2023-05-22vs Brett/WilkinsonWon 41
W#1 DoublesVitalija Bechtold / Lea Brandt vs Elizabeth Malm-Buatsi / Julie Klein6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesElizabeth Ball vs Gina Whorley3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Crosby / Sarah Bohl vs Allie Brett / Leah Sirois6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Spencer vs Katie Wilkinson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesReagan Brown / Sarah Paetzold vs Amy Susan / Hannah Holzum6-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Adult Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bohl - Columbia51201024230
2Brett/Wilkinson15102042304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Carolyn Spencer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Lea Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.57
Caroline Guy
published 3.5
3.40
KEIRA HAMANN
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.40
Vitalija Bechtold
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.39
Sarah Bohl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.06
Alicia Casady
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Elizabeth Ball
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.03
Reagan Brown
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Julia Norregaard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Crosby
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
NICOLE Reynolds
published
Regan Ubinas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Paetzold
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vitalija Bechtold + Sarah Bohl0537% games−6.8% vs expected
Vitalija Bechtold + Lea Brandt4168% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Spencer + Caroline Guy5076% gamesnot enough data
Vitalija Bechtold + Carolyn Spencer314 matchesnot enough data
Sarah Bohl + Lauren Crosby404 matchesnot enough data
Julia Norregaard + Alicia Casady213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carolyn Spencer
28W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Lea Brandt
35W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%29%71%
3.58
3.5
Caroline Guy
13W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.57
KEIRA HAMANN
20W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.40
Vitalija Bechtold
17W–19L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Sarah Bohl
15W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.39
3.5
Alicia Casady
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.06
Elizabeth Ball
7W–4L career · 5 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.05
Reagan Brown
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Julia Norregaard
8W–8L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Crosby
12W–3L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
NICOLE Reynolds
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Regan Ubinas
3W–14L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Paetzold
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.