Teams

Schluter-Ortis 18/6.5/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men

18 players · average NTRP 3.25 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-03Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHauke Bayer / Jason Ortis vs Eric Gay / Jordan Williams5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesScott Cuevas / Jack Schluter vs Allen Amir Parvizian / Cristian Topescu3-6, 6-7
2025-08-23Won 10
W#2 DoublesDouglas Dillon / Jack Schluter vs Aaron Sinclair / Warren Griffin6-1, 6-3
2025-08-20Lost 02
L#1 DoublesHauke Bayer / Travis Motichek vs Paul Roy / David Appe2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAlan Schluter / Jack Schluter vs Chris Corkern / Kannon Otillio1-6, 2-6
2025-08-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesHauke Bayer / Jason Ortis vs Kenny Wollfarth / John Shylock2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-09Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAlan Schluter / Jack Schluter vs Charles Renwick / Dallas Swan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Chandler Courreges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Derek Haney
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.16
Alan Schluter
usually #3 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.46
Alexander Mata Iv
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
Dalton Mott
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Douglas Dillon
usually #2 Doubles 86%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Ethan Hunt
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Hauke Bayer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jack Schluter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jason Catt
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 39% · published
Jason Ortis
usually #1 Doubles 39%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Landon Brown
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Mark Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Michael Burdge
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published
Ross Doyle
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Scott Cuevas
usually #3 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Wayne Songy
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Cuevas + Jason Catt4161% gamesnot enough data
Alan Schluter + Jason Ortis134 matchesnot enough data
Douglas Dillon + Jason Ortis213 matchesnot enough data
Travis Motichek + Alexander Mata Iv033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chandler Courreges
28W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Derek Haney
15W–10L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alan Schluter
5W–23L career · 15 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
2.5
Alexander Mata Iv
14W–30L career · type S · 14 lines in 2025
0%61%39%
2.46
Dalton Mott
4W–1L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Douglas Dillon
8W–9L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ethan Hunt
15W–4L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Hauke Bayer
1W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jack Schluter
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Catt
35W–14L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jason Ortis
14W–33L career · 25 lines in 2025
not enough data
Landon Brown
9W–12L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Lucas
16W–12L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Burdge
17W–38L career · 11 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ross Doyle
17W–7L career · 14 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Cuevas
27W–20L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Motichek
15W–28L career · 22 lines in 2025
not enough data
Wayne Songy
11W–22L career · 19 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.