Teams

RJ LSCune/CSD-Spartan Park

2023-2024 Racquets & Jackets Doubles League · Women Division C (2.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.06 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 DoublesDanielle Russo / Christine Rowland vs Jenna Hunt / Katie Liebman7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSheila Reitler / Christine Bogojevich vs Jan Wildman / Norma Zitnik5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-01-11vs RJ LHHughes/Jetton ParkLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrooke Modlin / Brittney Arce vs Jenny Brewton / Gina van Nortwick4-6, 1-6
2024-01-04vs RJ LHSchoenrock-KGibson/CSDWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrooke Modlin / Danielle Russo vs Hanna Schoenrock / Taysha Wendt6-3, 6-2
2023-12-07vs RJ LMEHerrmann-Connolly/TrumpLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristine Bogojevich / Lee Bierer vs Allison Nelin / Aleah Wolfe2-6, 2-6
2023-11-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesBrittney Arce / Danielle Russo vs Christy Walker / Debra Agostinelli4-6, 2-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women Division C (2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Christine Bogojevich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Sheila Reitler
published
2.91
Sallie Cune
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.83
Brittney Arce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Danielle Russo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Brooke Modlin
published 3
2.69
Claudia Burdulis
published 3
2.62
Charlotte Rorech
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Becky Kumar
published 3
2.51
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Russo + Brittney Arce6259% gamesnot enough data
Christine Rowland + Danielle Russo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Bogojevich
163W–96L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Sheila Reitler
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Sallie Cune
77W–82L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Brittney Arce
26W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Danielle Russo
38W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Brooke Modlin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Claudia Burdulis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
3
Charlotte Rorech
22W–133L career · 8 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Becky Kumar
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Christine Rowland
3W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.