Teams

MATT HALL

2026 SETX 40 & Over · 3.0 Men 40 & OVER

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-28vs MARC MERCADOLost 01
L#1 SinglesDaniel Rowe vs JUAN LOPEZ0-6, 2-6
2026-03-21vs JEREMY MASTERSLost 01
L#3 DoublesBill Keating / Silvano Sanchez vs Craig Bryant / Russell Mires1-6, 3-6
2026-03-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDaniel Rowe vs Craig Bryant2-6, 2-6
2026-02-24vs JEREMY MASTERSLost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Keating / Daniel Rowe vs Larry Sanders / Thomas Vos2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-02-24vs MARC MERCADOLost 01
L#3 DoublesMitchell Long / Daniel Rowe vs David Hammons / Jim Lancaster3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.95
Chuck Kiker
published 3
2.84
Silvano Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Daniel Rowe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.62
Gary Freeman
published 3
2.61
Steven Luketich
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chuck Kiker
9W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.95
Silvano Sanchez
12W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Daniel Rowe
7W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Gary Freeman
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Steven Luketich
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.61
Roberto Diaz-Diosdado
4W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.