← Teams

MAC-Bounds/Popma

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Kim Hasle
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
—
Amy Convery
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Rebecca McMasters
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Michelle Posey
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.39
Julie Kim
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.24
Alexandra Lee
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jill Eilers
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Michele Desmarais
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Hanny Tan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Caroline Popma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2023-06-02Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesKim Hasle / Michelle Posey vs Michelle Zawadzki / Morgan Towle6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCaroline Popma / Rebecca McMasters vs Kristen LaBarca / Julie LaMontagne6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJulie Kim / Lee Rahr vs Colleen Walker / Kelly Norling6-4, 6-4
2023-05-21Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichele Desmarais / Kim Hasle vs Emily Vander Ploeg / Karen Harlow6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCaroline Popma / Michelle Posey vs Michelle Ruby / Wendy Nakatani6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJulie Kim / Alexandra Lee vs Dayna Jahnke-Corwin / Alena Lauritsen6-1, 6-3
2023-05-13Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMichelle Posey / Michele Desmarais vs Annette Hill / Colleen Kellogg6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHanny Tan / Cynthia Mulflur vs Amy Ouellette / Kim Boston6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-06Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCaroline Popma / Marcy Bernhardt vs Shannon Chen / Heather Lee3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Torch / Rebecca McMasters vs Patty Chen / Woohyung Kim6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJulie Kim / Alexandra Lee vs Kim Tellin / Jenna Dornblaser4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-04-29Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesMichelle Posey / Kim Hasle vs Christy Buckman / Kristin Campbell6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Torch / Rebecca McMasters vs Amy Cooney / Sarah Robertson7-5, 7-5
W#3 DoublesJen Lawrence / Jill Eilers vs Christine Brecht / Marilyn von Bergen6-4, 6-1
2023-04-21Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesMichelle Posey / Amy Convery vs Jeanna Nicotera / Garrene Mcgale6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJill Eilers / Hanny Tan vs Colleen Kellogg / Annette Hill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-16Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesKim Hasle / Marcy Bernhardt vs Maritess Mayer / Michelle Dombek6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Eilers / Hanny Tan vs Dipali Dixit / Carolyn Schilling6-2, 6-2
2023-04-08Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesAmy Convery / Kim Hasle vs Karen Pickering / Tammy LaFrazia6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJulie Kim / Alexandra Lee vs Trylla Lembke / Lorna Goth6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCaroline Popma / Rebecca McMasters vs Patti Dybdahl / Lauren Holloway5-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Kim Hasle
44W–28L career
5%91%5%
3.78
4
Amy Convery
20W–10L career
not enough data
—
4
Rebecca McMasters
69W–51L career
41%59%0%
3.47
4
Michelle Posey
76W–43L career
45%55%0%
3.47
4
Julie Kim
49W–37L career · type A
61%39%0%
3.39
3.5
Alexandra Lee
32W–13L career
2%98%1%
3.24
3.5
Jill Eilers
34W–18L career
2%97%0%
3.23
3.5
Michele Desmarais
56W–45L career
7%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Hanny Tan
44W–24L career
7%93%0%
3.18
3.5
Caroline Popma
45W–30L career
11%89%0%
3.16

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.