Teams

LCTA18/Snyder/CTC

2022 USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Men 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2022-04-07Lost 01
L#2 SinglesAdam Smith vs Tyler Dulmage3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Eric Snyder
published 4.5
3.90
Jason Daigle
published
3.86
Mark Andrews
published
3.76
Bryce Donovan
published 4
3.73
Neil Dickinson
published
3.72
3.67
John Isenhower
published
3.66
ANDREI MAZERE
published 4
3.61
Patrick Rice
published
3.59
Wesley DeLancey
published
3.50
Adam Smith
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 43% · published 3.5
3.40
Ben Hintz
published 4
3.38
Shane Farrell
published
David Schaeffer
published 3.5
Joseph Nemeth
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Daigle + Bryce Donovan7451% games−14.6% vs expected
Jason Daigle + Eric Snyder3251% gamesnot enough data
Eric Snyder + Bryce Donovan2343% gamesnot enough data
Neil Dickinson + Joseph Nemeth134 matchesnot enough data
Neil Dickinson + John Isenhower224 matchesnot enough data
Jason Daigle + Joseph Nemeth404 matchesnot enough data
Neil Dickinson + Jason Daigle213 matchesnot enough data
Wesley DeLancey + Shane Farrell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Eric Snyder
30W–39L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
4.12
Jason Daigle
92W–75L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
Mark Andrews
29W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Bryce Donovan
29W–25L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Neil Dickinson
30W–33L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Christopher Betros
18W–9L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
John Isenhower
27W–33L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
ANDREI MAZERE
20W–32L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
Patrick Rice
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%20%80%
3.61
Wesley DeLancey
83W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.59
3.5
Adam Smith
129W–51L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
4
Ben Hintz
10W–14L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Shane Farrell
34W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
David Schaeffer
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Nemeth
32W–39L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.