Teams

LAL Men's 7.5 Combo - Capt Andy

2022 WI Combo · WI Combo 7.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-11vs LAL 7.5 Mixed Combo - TungWon 20
W#1 DoublesJackson Allison / Brett Meddaugh vs Tung Ouy / Bryan Snipes6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Heer / Eric Rowekamp vs John Aschenbrenner / Sureshkumar Mohanarajan6-2, 7-5
2022-07-28vs LAL Men's 7.5 Combo-Capt DylanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackson Allison / Andrew Seithamer vs Nathan Tunks / Randall Moseng5-7, 4-6
2022-07-21vs LAL 7.5 Mixed Combo - TungWon 10
W#1 DoublesJackson Allison / Ruben Anderson vs Tung Ouy / Gregory Jameson6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-07vs LAL 7.5 Mixed Combo - TungLost 02
L#1 DoublesGriffin Wagg / Brett Meddaugh vs Bryan Snipes / Tung Ouy3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEric Rowekamp / Ruben Anderson vs Gregory Jameson / Nathan Tunks4-6, 0-6
2022-06-30vs LAL Men's 7.5 Combo-Capt DylanWon 20
W#1 DoublesGriffin Wagg / Brett Meddaugh vs Dylan Meyer / Brennan Quinn6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJoseph Heer / Dillon Eddingsaas vs Kyle Jensen / Sureshkumar Mohanarajan6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2022-06-23vs LAL 7.5 Mixed Combo - TungLost 02
L#1 DoublesGriffin Wagg / Andrew Roberts vs Dylan Meyer / Tung Ouy1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDillon Eddingsaas / Joseph Heer vs Randall Moseng / Nathan Tunks6-7, 2-6
2022-06-09vs LAL Men's 7.5 Combo-Capt DylanSplit 11
W#2 DoublesRuben Anderson / Eric Rowekamp vs Nathan Tunks / Jeff Wittrock7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoseph Heer / Keith Kenyon vs Kyle Jensen / Brennan Quinn2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Brett Meddaugh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Griffin Wagg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Dillon Eddingsaas
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Andrew Seithamer
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Eric Rowekamp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Jackson Allison
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Joseph Heer
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Keith Kenyon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ruben Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Seithamer + Dillon Eddingsaas224 matchesnot enough data
Brett Meddaugh + Dillon Eddingsaas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brett Meddaugh
52W–30L career · 9 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Griffin Wagg
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.50
3.5
Dillon Eddingsaas
45W–49L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
3
Andrew Seithamer
55W–45L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Eric Rowekamp
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jackson Allison
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joseph Heer
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keith Kenyon
6W–5L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Ruben Anderson
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.