Teams

Sanders/Bennett/Dickson\LRAC

2023 Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2023-08-23vs Dill/Hartsfield/NLR/BPLost 01
L#1 DoublesRebecca Kinworthy / Michelle Damon vs Deborah Benson / Cindy Seay-Webb3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Sheffield Duke
published
3.70
Pam Landis
published
3.70
Rebecca Kinworthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Marti Henson
published
3.30
Deborah Bennett
published 3.5
3.27
Maureen Dickson
published
3.16
Valerie Cloud
published
3.12
Kelli Beavers
published
2.96
Mary Bennett
published
2.95
Lynette Bowersock
published
2.90
Pricilla Backus
published
Lynnette Hannahs
published
Michelle Damon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Bennett + Maureen Dickson2348% games−4.4% vs expected
Marti Henson + Sheffield Duke213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheffield Duke
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
Pam Landis
45W–27L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Rebecca Kinworthy
163W–105L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Marti Henson
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Deborah Bennett
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Maureen Dickson
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Valerie Cloud
5W–16L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
3.16
Kelli Beavers
4W–14L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
Mary Bennett
11W–16L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Lynette Bowersock
11W–18L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
2.95
Pricilla Backus
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
77%23%<1%
2.90
Lynnette Hannahs
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michelle Damon
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.