Teams

KGreathouse (Park Road)

2023 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-07vs MLudwiczak (Blakeney)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesShannon Lind / Amanda Gustafson vs Rachel Grantham / Anita Stewart-Stover7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBernice Cutler / Karie Greathouse vs Mikiko Garrett / Catherine Gilbride3-6, 5-7
2023-05-03vs CMiles (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBernice Cutler / Karie Greathouse vs Alliecia Butler / FpommeFrances Pommells3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-04-19vs KCronin/JJoliet (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Shannon Lind vs Rebecca Cooper / Marion Mande6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-04-05vs CHobson (Veterans Park)Split 11
W#1 DoublesShannon Lind / Elizabeth Murphy vs Emma Schaafsma / Kelley Conrad7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKarie Greathouse vs Sarah Zolper2-6, 0-6
2023-03-29vs ASunden (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Shannon Lind vs Lesley Quick / Nicole Love6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-15vs KHeidkamp/Hill (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKarie Greathouse / Jane Bee vs Karen Claffey / Christine Leavitt6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTasha Cooper / Bernice Cutler vs Kristin Heidkamp / Susie Fragale7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Jessica Abrams
published
3.37
Jane Bee
published
3.24
Bernice Cutler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Shannon Lind
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.98
Amy Eberhardt
published 3
2.94
Christina Dunn
published 3
2.90
Karie Greathouse
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.76
Bridgette Martin
published 3
2.68
Tasha Cooper
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Eberhardt + Shannon Lind2352% games+8.3% vs expected
Bernice Cutler + Karie Greathouse3845% gamesnot enough data
Karie Greathouse + Shannon Lind213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jessica Abrams
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Jane Bee
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.37
3.5
Bernice Cutler
15W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Shannon Lind
49W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Amy Eberhardt
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
2.98
3
Christina Dunn
12W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Karie Greathouse
66W–82L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Bridgette Martin
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
2.76
Tasha Cooper
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.