Teams

Tennis Zone

Adult 18 and over · 4.5 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.44 / EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-28vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sWon 31
L#1 DoublesTea Amerise / Julie Kitze vs Kelly Nguyen / Morgan Colver4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Lucy Ann Taffner7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Favia / Melinda Lee vs Jenelle Ross / Natalie Everhardt6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMina Kuriashkin / Gayle Connelly vs Marina Giolas / Nina Drinnan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-21vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sWon 31
W#1 DoublesCary Leung / Mina Kuriashkin vs Marina Giolas / Natalie Everhardt6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Rachel Casey6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Nelson / Julie Kitze vs Alejandra Quiros / Heidi Pernia2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesIsabel Mejia / Gayle Connelly vs Laura Eichman / Morgan Colver6-3, 6-1
2026-06-14vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMina Kuriashkin / Kumhui Feindler vs Kelly Nguyen / Alejandra Quiros6-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIsabel Mejia vs Rachel Casey6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMelinda Lee / Suzanne Favia vs Frieda Brinkmann / Nina Drinnan6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNicole Kalorin / Eileen Neff vs Tina Jago / Laura Eichman4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-06-07vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sWon 31
W#1 DoublesCary Leung / Mina Kuriashkin vs Kimberly Santerian / Meredith Galto7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNicole Kalorin vs Rachel Casey3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Favia / Susan Dixon Thompson vs Laurie Memis / Natalie Everhardt6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTea Amerise / Julie Kitze vs Tina Jago / Melissa Henning3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-31vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelinda Lee / Kristina Alling vs Laurie Memis / Frieda Brinkmann6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Natalie Everhardt6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKumhui Feindler / Pamela Vail vs Alejandra Quiros / Heidi Pernia3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJODI ESLINGER / Jennifer Nelson vs Rosemary Sudol / Jenelle Ross7-5, 6-3
2026-05-17vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelinda Lee / Kristina Alling vs Kimberly Santerian / Meredith Galto3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesElise Gerdes vs Anna Will7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesMina Kuriashkin / Cary Leung vs Kelly Nguyen / Morgan Colver4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKumhui Feindler / Pamela Vail vs Lucy Ann Taffner / Rosemary Sudol7-6, 6-4
2026-05-03vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sSplit 22
L#1 DoublesPamela Vail / Kei Imanishi vs Alejandra Quiros / Kelly Nguyen4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMina Kuriashkin vs Melissa Henning6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristina Alling / Jennifer Nelson vs Kimberly Santerian / Meredith Galto7-6, 3-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJODI ESLINGER / Susan Dixon Thompson vs Natalie Everhardt / Morgan Colver7-6, 6-5
2026-04-19vs 1, 2, 3, 4.5sSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKei Imanishi / Cary Leung vs Alejandra Quiros / Anna Will6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTea Amerise vs Kelly Nguyen2-6, 4-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Favia / Susan Dixon Thompson vs Jenelle Ross / Frieda Brinkmann6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Nelson / Eileen Neff vs Laurie Memis / Heidi Pernia2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Elise Gerdes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Kei Imanishi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.37
Pamela Vail
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.29
Cary Leung
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.28
Mina Kuriashkin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
4.23
Isabel Mejia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.20
Kristina Alling
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Melinda Lee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.12
Kumhui Feindler
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.10
Gayle Connelly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Suzanne Favia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
JODI ESLINGER
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.05
Susan Dixon Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Tea Amerise
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.99
Julie Kitze
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.97
Eileen Neff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Nicole Kalorin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Dixon Thompson + Suzanne Favia5064% games+9.9% vs expected
Cary Leung + Kumhui Feindler15358% games+5.3% vs expected
Kristina Alling + Melinda Lee25560% games+3.1% vs expected
Cary Leung + Mina Kuriashkin7261% games−0.1% vs expected
Cary Leung + Gayle Connelly033 matchesnot enough data
Julie Kitze + Eileen Neff213 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Alling + Gayle Connelly123 matchesnot enough data
Mina Kuriashkin + Gayle Connelly303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elise Gerdes
120W–89L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Kei Imanishi
88W–76L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
4.37
Pamela Vail
87W–37L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
4.37
4.5
Cary Leung
47W–46L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Mina Kuriashkin
107W–58L career · 6 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.28
Isabel Mejia
21W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
4.23
4.5
Kristina Alling
161W–73L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.20
Melinda Lee
102W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
Kumhui Feindler
56W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
4.5
Gayle Connelly
166W–152L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
4.10
4.5
Suzanne Favia
198W–131L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
4.09
JODI ESLINGER
75W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
4.07
Susan Dixon Thompson
110W–80L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
Tea Amerise
3W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Julie Kitze
83W–128L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
3.99
4
Eileen Neff
47W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
Nicole Kalorin
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.