Teams

YOU'VE BEEN SERVED//OKC

2022 ESL Fall 18&over League · 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-01vs BAD ACES//OKCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cox / Kristin Desmond vs Brooke Bogert / Kelsey Gilbert0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Lazarus vs Jessica Crowder0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Woodie / Crystal James vs Carly Costello / Robyn Brewster4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-03-03vs ECC GIRL GANG//ECCLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Lazarus / Teresa Smith vs Molly Zeavin / Leslie Dolezal6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Woodie vs Srividhya Muralidharan0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Desmond / Lynn Pinaroc vs Tynia Watson / Emma Lyons6-1, 6-2
2021-11-04vs ALL ABOUT THAT BASELINE//ECCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKristin Desmond / Teresa Smith vs Hannah Stewart / Jessica Anderson7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Shanbour / Amy Woodie vs Ruth Seba / MacY Wilson1-6, 5-7
2021-10-26vs SERVE-ACES//OKCLost 03
L#1 DoublesShannon Purnell / Amy Lazarus vs Marilyn Morris / Amy Pyles6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaty Powers vs Natalie Haymaker1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKristin Desmond / Amy Woodie vs Claire Turmelle / Tiffany Little6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-21vs OK/McClintock/NETCHIX/18&over2.5 WLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Ram / Katy Powers vs Niki McClintock / Dana Garner3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Lazarus vs Lisa Mullen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCrystal James / Lynn Pinaroc vs Kelly Moody / Susie Vesper5-7, 1-6
2021-10-07vs THE RACQUETTES//OKCGCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Lazarus / Jennifer Cox vs Jennifer Grantham / Landrea Cabato6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaty Powers vs Brenna See2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKristin Desmond / Emily Shanbour vs Elizabeth Hoehn / Evie Holzer6-0, 6-1
2021-09-23vs COUGARS//GreensLost 02
L#1 DoublesTeresa Smith / Kathleen Ram vs SUSAN LOBSINGER / Katrina Giron0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Purnell / Amy Woodie vs Kari Kosanke / Darci Dillard1-6, 1-6
2021-09-16vs THE RACQ PAQ//GreensWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathleen Ram / Emily Shanbour vs Bailey Bright / Erika Silberg6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAmy Lazarus vs Samara Terrill6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCrystal James / Shannon Purnell vs Lindsey Fixley / Malarie Jackson5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-09-09vs SERVE ME ANOTHER//QCWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Smith / Katy Powers vs Brooke Bollenbach / Sarah Thomas6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLynn Pinaroc / Kristin Desmond vs Julie Dreiling / Kara McDonald6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/McClintock/NETCHIX/18&over2.5 W9020718196
2COUGARS//Greens7219818168
3SERVE-ACES//OKC7219821206
4BAD ACES//OKC7218923182
5ALL ABOUT THAT BASELINE//ECC45141330236
6ECC GIRL GANG//ECC45101738265
7SERVE ME ANOTHER//QC36141330214
8YOU'VE BEEN SERVED//OKC36111635241
9THE RACQ PAQ//Greens1872042277
10THE RACQUETTES//OKCGCC0932450306

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Lazarus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Crystal James
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Amy Woodie
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.52
Lynn Pinaroc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Shannon Purnell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Emily Shanbour
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Kathleen Ram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Katy Powers
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristin Desmond
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Mary Melvin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Desmond + Crystal James3263% games+6.6% vs expected
Shannon Purnell + Emily Shanbour3351% gamesnot enough data
Katy Powers + Mary Melvin033 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Purnell + Lynn Pinaroc213 matchesnot enough data
Lynn Pinaroc + Kristin Desmond303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Lazarus
48W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Crystal James
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Amy Woodie
42W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.56
Lynn Pinaroc
34W–44L career · 3 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
Shannon Purnell
58W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Emily Shanbour
35W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
0%93%7%
2.31
Kathleen Ram
37W–29L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Katy Powers
18W–38L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Desmond
44W–26L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Melvin
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.