Teams

Sun City Center - B. Astone

2025 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-03-08vs Hunters Green Geezers - M. WarrenLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaul Shanley / Randy McPhee vs John Cotey / Doug Angelone4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKEVIN JOHNSON / Brian Gray vs Christopher Baker / Ken Kranick6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBob Astone / Qin Yang vs Chris Burdge / John Phillips2-6, 2-6
2025-03-01vs Hills/Jenkins/55&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesKEVIN JOHNSON / Brian Gray vs Max R Francois / Brian Westmoreland6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNeal Peterson / Qin Yang vs Rick Burkhart / Byron Gibbs Wilson6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRon Bartell / Rick Fortier vs Steven Jenkins / Richard J Derr3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 55 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
KEVIN JOHNSON
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Brian Gray
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Randy McPhee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Qin Yang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Neal Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Bob Astone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Paul Shanley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rick Fortier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

KEVIN JOHNSON + Qin Yang1642% games+8.7% vs expected
Randy McPhee + Paul Shanley0834% gamesnot enough data
Brian Gray + Bob Astone3348% gamesnot enough data
Qin Yang + Neal Peterson2344% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

KEVIN JOHNSON
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Brian Gray
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
Randy McPhee
4W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Qin Yang
4W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Neal Peterson
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.15
3
Bob Astone
14W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Paul Shanley
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rick Fortier
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.