Teams

5-CPeterson-HVCC

2023 Eno River Singles 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-07-25Won 10
W#3 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-07-18vs 2-MJDunnington-UNC-40 3.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCecily Peterson vs Mary Jo Dunnington1-6, 0-6
2023-06-29vs 1-SBrogden-Eno-40Lost 01
L#2 SinglesRhiannon Ludington vs Martha Clippinger3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Amy Herman
published 3.5
3.47
Lindsay King
published
3.45
Alana Argersinger
published 3.5
3.41
Caroline Hamilton
published 3.5
3.36
3.13
Rhiannon Ludington
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
3.10
Gina Goldthwaite
published 3.5
3.04
Cecily Peterson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amy Herman
29W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%21%79%
3.60
Lindsay King
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Alana Argersinger
35W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Caroline Hamilton
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
3.41
Mary Susan Easterling
25W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3
Rhiannon Ludington
93W–83L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Gina Goldthwaite
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Cecily Peterson
209W–207L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.