Teams

Smith, John

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter 2.5W - 5.0 & Open · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2024-10-19vs Hanover, ScottWon 21
W#1 DoublesSteve Baker / Patrick Klein vs R Scott Hanover / Christopher Fields6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Marcott / Joel Rook vs Tristan Houchin / Anthony Seim6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChris Cox / Brad Hagen vs Andrew Hall / Daniel Knox6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bond Marrs
published 4
Chris Cox
published 4
3.72
Jeffrey Marcott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Joel Rook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Patrick Klein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Brad Harding
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Blair Hinkle
published 4
3.48
David Caldwell
published 4
3.46
Brad Hagen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.09
Steve Boos
published
John Smith
published
Steve Baker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brad Harding + Jeffrey Marcott10754% games+2.4% vs expected
Steve Baker + Joel Rook7158% games+1.9% vs expected
Brad Harding + David Caldwell4840% games−2.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Marcott + Joel Rook101049% games−2.4% vs expected
John Smith + Steve Baker0633% games−11.0% vs expected
Jeffrey Marcott + Blair Hinkle2444% games−14.4% vs expected
Brad Harding + Joel Rook1533% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Marcott + Steve Baker2348% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bond Marrs
16W–54L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Cox
27W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeffrey Marcott
65W–61L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Joel Rook
37W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Patrick Klein
56W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
4
Brad Harding
51W–88L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Blair Hinkle
17W–15L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
David Caldwell
16W–47L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Brad Hagen
7W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.46
Steve Boos
21W–39L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
3.09
John Smith
4W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Steve Baker
21W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.