Teams

SWilhelmy

2022 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.30 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-08vs MTulenkoComboLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheri Kohan / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Sandra Chapman-Wilson / Rachael Kiker2-6, 3-6
2022-09-29vs KPatreyLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolina Robayo / Kelleigh Russo vs Jane Williams / Deb Lanier3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSara Wilhelmy / Gillian Kelleher vs Jeme Avent / Lisa Kempf2-6, 1-6
2022-09-24vs MEveritt 18+ ComboSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCarolina Robayo / Suyeon Kim vs Melissa Everitt / Laurie Parker7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSara Wilhelmy / Hollyene Turner vs Alicia Arana / ROBIN Lamb2-6, 2-6
2022-09-17vs JKellyLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarolina Robayo / AnneSophie Dorey vs Emily Cutts / Ginny Meier0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGillian Kelleher / Sara Wilhelmy vs Jackie Caprio / Kerry Ruggieri3-6, 4-6
2022-08-27vs PHankersonLost 01
L#2 DoublesGillian Kelleher / Sara Wilhelmy vs Ashley McRae / Chequetta Ann Nobles Hall3-6, 6-7
2022-08-20vs GThayer Fall Combo RRCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaurene Fitzgerald / Kelleigh Russo vs Adriana Craft / Claire Hying3-6
L#2 DoublesGillian Kelleher / Sara Wilhelmy vs Elena Pinkus / Meryl Golder1-6, 1-6
2022-08-13vs MTulenkoComboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCheri Kohan / Gillian Kelleher vs Susan Paeplow / Amy Wolfe7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSuyeon Kim / Laurene Fitzgerald vs Mariana Lima Gonzalez / Averil Glover6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Suyeon Kim
published
3.16
Gillian Kelleher
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Carolina Robayo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Kelleigh Russo
published
3.02
Sara Wilhelmy
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.02
Joanie Arteta
published
2.84
Laurene Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Fiona Patterson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Wilhelmy + Gillian Kelleher9850% gamesnot enough data
Carolina Robayo + Gillian Kelleher2544% gamesnot enough data
Carolina Robayo + Laurene Fitzgerald1444% gamesnot enough data
Sara Wilhelmy + Carolina Robayo134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suyeon Kim
11W–18L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
166W–164L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–190L career · 3 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Kelleigh Russo
4W–10L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Sara Wilhelmy
60W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
Joanie Arteta
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Laurene Fitzgerald
101W–157L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Fiona Patterson
1W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.