Teams

Le.Corn55C

2023 Cap Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-09-25vs Ta.LeFevre55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Susan Hembarsky vs Vicky Arne / Martha Funsten6-7, 2-6
2023-09-18vs Le.Magee55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Leslie Corn vs Leigh Magee / Suzanne Wagner6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2023-09-11vs An.Ashburn55CWon 20
W#1 DoublesTracey Carlin / Sherry Ingle vs Mary Cockrill / Luann Richardson3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Leslie Corn vs Jean Williams / Cynthia White6-1, 6-2
2023-08-28vs Su.Rose55CLost 01
L#2 DoublesSusan Flanagan / Susan Hembarsky vs Kimberley Matthews / India Pleasants2-6, 3-6
2023-08-21vs Da.Miller55CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Hembarsky / Donna Wells vs Pamela McCollum / Jamie Kerzner7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Corn / Sherry Ingle vs Alacia Billow / Aliza Bricklin6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2023-08-14vs Da.Weiland55CLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Wells / Susan Hembarsky vs Jennifer Bricker / Nancy Baird3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSherry Ingle / Tracey Carlin vs Donna Petrilla / Leigh Kimball6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLeslie Corn / Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk vs Averil Glover / Kathryn Beth Beam2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Tracey Carlin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.44
Donna Wells
published 4
3.27
Sherry Ingle
published
3.23
3.12
Susan Hembarsky
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.99
Leslie Corn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Joyce Lake
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Corn + Susan Hembarsky121151% games−1.5% vs expected
Tracey Carlin + Susan Hembarsky7172% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Ingle + Susan Hembarsky224 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Corn + Tracey Carlin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tracey Carlin
156W–108L career · 2 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Donna Wells
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.44
Sherry Ingle
15W–12L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
Tammy Gonzalez-Borsuk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Susan Hembarsky
102W–133L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Leslie Corn
93W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Joyce Lake
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.