Teams

LS:Tequila & Lyme 2:Trusilo

2024 ECT Adult 18& Non Advancing Women · 2024 Spring 2.5 W Non Advancing

14 players · average NTRP 2.60 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-06-15vs GF:Glam Slammers:WangLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Gingras / Sondra Griswold vs Melissa Fogerty / Cecile Johnson4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKelly Trusilo vs Pamela Chiechi4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCrystal King / Julie Martel vs Patricia Lee / Leah Russell6-4, 6-3
2024-06-08vs LS: Lennon Lyme Delights:LennonWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathleen Ridgway / Cecilia Curley vs Lisa Addabbo / Katherine Flynn6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCrystal King vs Leslie Hawley5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKelly Trusilo / Sondra Griswold vs Jean Lennon / Kelsey Murphy6-4, 7-5
2024-06-02vs LS: Lennon Lyme Delights:LennonWon 21
W#1 DoublesCecilia Curley / Kelly Trusilo vs Jean Lennon / Marie Shepherd7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeigh Buckman vs Chelsey Russ6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Martel / Lori Adler vs Lisa Addabbo / Kelsey Murphy4-6, 5-7
2024-05-12vs LS: Lennon Lyme Delights:LennonWon 21
L#1 DoublesChristine Andrew / Anastasia Boyd vs Jean Lennon / Marie Shepherd6-2, 5-2
W#1 SinglesLeigh Buckman vs Katherine Flynn6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCecilia Curley / Sarah Mayer vs Shelby Therieault / Leslie Hawley6-2, 7-6
2024-04-28vs GF:Glam Slammers:WangWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Andrew / Cecilia Curley vs Cecile Johnson / Peppina Haydock7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLeigh Buckman vs Annie Wang6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLori Adler / Anastasia Boyd vs Leah Russell / Christine Krueger7-5, 6-2
2024-04-21vs GF:Glam Slammers:WangLost 12
W#1 DoublesCrystal King / Christine Andrew vs Hanna King / Erica Musto6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKathleen Ridgway vs Pamela Pascale3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Fabrizi / Sarah Mayer vs Patricia Lee / Kate Bushey1-6, 4-6
2024-03-30vs LS: Lennon Lyme Delights:LennonWon 30
W#1 DoublesCecilia Curley / Cathie Sedlack vs Marie Shepherd / Lisa Addabbo7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLeigh Buckman vs Leslie Hawley6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Martel / Elizabeth Fabrizi vs Jean Lennon / Chelsey Russ6-2, 6-3
2024-03-17vs GF:Glam Slammers:WangLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristine Andrew / Julie Martel vs Melissa Fogerty / Rebecca Bower1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen Ridgway vs Annie Wang6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Trusilo / Anastasia Boyd vs Tatyana Oks / Hanna King7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 Spring 2.5 W Non Advancing have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Kathleen Ridgway
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
Leigh Buckman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Christine Andrew
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.33
Crystal King
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Anastasia Boyd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Julie Martel
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.22
Kelly Trusilo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.16
Cecilia Curley
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
1.86
Elizabeth Fabrizi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.83
Cathie Sedlack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Katie Gingras
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lori Adler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sondra Griswold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cecilia Curley + Christine Andrew5255% games+12.9% vs expected
Kelly Trusilo + Julie Martel3451% games+10.9% vs expected
Christine Andrew + Anastasia Boyd3267% games+10.4% vs expected
Kelly Trusilo + Anastasia Boyd1437% games−2.7% vs expected
Christine Andrew + Julie Martel4153% gamesnot enough data
Cecilia Curley + Leigh Buckman314 matchesnot enough data
Julie Martel + Crystal King134 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Trusilo + Cecilia Curley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Ridgway
15W–2L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Leigh Buckman
23W–8L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Christine Andrew
31W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.71
2.5
Crystal King
12W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Anastasia Boyd
14W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
Julie Martel
17W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.24
Kelly Trusilo
14W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Cecilia Curley
19W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.16
Elizabeth Fabrizi
5W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.86
2.5
Cathie Sedlack
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
0%>99%<1%
1.83
Katie Gingras
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Lori Adler
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sarah Mayer
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sondra Griswold
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.