Teams

CKing-SVC

2025 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-11vs JStewart-ENOWon 30
W#1 DoublesChrissy King / Elizabeth Arnold vs Jasmine Hemmings / Athena Samaras6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSarah Tuttle vs Sandy Rogowski6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanna Hess / Amy Logue vs Donnetta Hanson / Yemi Runsewe6-0, 6-3
2025-04-04vs CFong-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Misiti / Chrissy King vs Sina Mathew / Tania Wilkins7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Arnold vs Amy Peters7-5, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLori Small / Kelsey Phillips vs Cara Fong / Catherine Fleming4-6, 0-6
2025-03-28vs APerry-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesSarah Tuttle vs Ashley Perry7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Logue / Lori Small vs Kylie Herst / Melaine Young3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.33 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Megan Prieto
published
2.57
Laura Malahias
published
2.42
Sarah Tuttle
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.40
Janna Hess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Chrissy King
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Cheryl Molinatto
published 2.5
2.28
Elizabeth Misiti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Jessica Winger
published
2.15
Anne Starling
published 2.5
1.87
Lori Small
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Amy Logue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Arnold
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kelsey Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Natasha Wiley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chrissy King + Elizabeth Misiti6358% games+11.8% vs expected
Sarah Tuttle + Jessica Winger134 matchesnot enough data
Chrissy King + Janna Hess213 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Misiti + Janna Hess213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Prieto
13W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.78
Laura Malahias
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.57
Sarah Tuttle
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%71%29%
2.42
Janna Hess
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
2.5
Chrissy King
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Cheryl Molinatto
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Elizabeth Misiti
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Jessica Winger
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Anne Starling
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.15
Lori Small
0W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Amy Logue
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Arnold
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelsey Phillips
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Natasha Wiley
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.