Teams

McNatt 18 2.5

2025 Fall 18 & Over 2.5W - 5.0 · 2.5 Adult 18 Women

7 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-19vs Page 18 2.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesAmanda Davis / Nina McNatt vs Dana Hill / Kelsey Gilmer2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRhonda Pounders vs Jodi Page6-3, 6-2
2024-12-01vs SH - WalkerLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hargett / Rhonda Pounders vs Amy Reeves / Veronica Stancil5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNina McNatt / Heather Willis vs Monica Moon / Paula Pounders2-6, 0-6
2024-11-12vs J.Smith Fall 2.5 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Kroeger / Nina McNatt vs Kim Azeem / Wendy Black3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesRhonda Pounders vs Elizabeth Mitchell0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Butler / Mandy Barksdale vs Christine Davis / Liz Wilcoxson6-3, 6-4
2024-10-29vs Page 18 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMelissa Hargett / Laura Kroeger vs Jodi Page / Lorie Scott6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNina McNatt / Heather Willis vs Theresa Burns / Keylee Allison6-1, 6-4
2024-10-22vs SH - WalkerLost 02
L#1 DoublesNina McNatt / Heather Willis vs Amy Reeves / Tammy Willis0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Butler / Rhonda Pounders vs Cindy Walker / Monica Moon0-6, 2-6
2024-10-08vs J.Smith Fall 2.5 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Hargett / Amanda Davis vs Donna Ellison / Christine Davis1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHeather Willis / Vickie Hill vs Wendy Black / Laura Smith1-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Laura Kroeger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.22
Nina McNatt
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.20
Rhonda Pounders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.15
Melissa Hargett
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.92
Laura Butler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mandy Barksdale
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vickie Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rhonda Pounders + Nina McNatt1539% games−7.4% vs expected
Melissa Hargett + Nina McNatt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Kroeger
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Nina McNatt
19W–29L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Rhonda Pounders
14W–31L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.20
Melissa Hargett
11W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.15
Laura Butler
1W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.92
Mandy Barksdale
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vickie Hill
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.