Teams

Kiwi - Raymond

2022 Brevard Trilevel · 2.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-10-13vs Brevard/RCCB - HeynWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracey Draper / Terra Hovan vs Trisha Watson / Allison Moorhead6-0, 6-2
2022-09-22vs Brevard/RCCB - HeynWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracey Draper / Terra Hovan vs Trisha Watson / Ginger Ballou6-1, 6-0
2022-09-20vs Brevard/RCCB - HeynSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnne Ramsey / Yvonne Salvatore vs Michele Heyn / Nancy Aumuller1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTerra Hovan / Tracey Draper vs Patty Aboud / Ginger Ballou6-2, 6-3
2022-09-01vs Brevard/RCCB - HeynWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerra Hovan / Yvonne Salvatore vs Lisa LeDoux / Trisha Watson3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-08-23vs Brevard/RCCB - HeynLost 01
L#2 DoublesYvonne Salvatore / Terra Hovan vs Tee Wells / Trisha Watson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Anne Ramsey
published 3.5
3.31
Terra Hovan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Leesa Brambach
published
3.07
Tracey Draper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Tracy Famiano
published
2.91
Julianne Moore
published
2.81
Angela Wong
published 3
2.80
Yvonne Salvatore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Jenifer Raymond
published
2.52
Danielle Carlson
published 2.5
2.27
Anne Burns
published 2.5
Ruby Nevin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracey Draper + Yvonne Salvatore1837% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Draper + Terra Hovan4169% gamesnot enough data
Yvonne Salvatore + Terra Hovan2348% gamesnot enough data
Jenifer Raymond + Danielle Carlson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anne Ramsey
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Terra Hovan
108W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Leesa Brambach
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Tracey Draper
69W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tracy Famiano
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Julianne Moore
22W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Angela Wong
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Yvonne Salvatore
97W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Jenifer Raymond
16W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%40%60%
2.53
2.5
Danielle Carlson
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
0%45%55%
2.52
2.5
Anne Burns
10W–17L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Ruby Nevin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.