Teams

SD 2.5 LJBTC/ Feuerstein

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SD WD · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-01vs SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ JimenezLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarly Feuerstein / Denise Gordon vs Hiroyo Poland / Victoria Surdykowski4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJohanna Palomino vs Ashton Ellis4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Carr / Kate Kassar vs Brigitte Cohen / Stephanie McAlister6-1, 6-1
2026-05-18vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ WilliamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJohanna Palomino / Paula Schafer vs Holly Swanson / Yara Williams6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKate Kassar vs Jamie Cooper7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTiffany Soriano / Nikki Singer vs Linda Hastings / Erica Smith1-6, 4-6
2026-05-11vs SD 2.5 Sunbow Park (2:1)/ CruzWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Carr / Kate Kassar vs Samaria Cruz / Katrina Contreras7-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJohanna Palomino vs Noor Hilmi0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRian Kalklosch / Tiffany Soriano vs Jennifer Contreras / Desiree Huynh6-1, 6-4
2026-04-29vs SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ WilliamsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarly Feuerstein / Denise Gordon vs Shannon Mcfarland / Holly Swanson4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlli Thurman vs Yara Williams4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNikki Singer / Tiffany Soriano vs Karen Lowe / Tobi Tanner6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-04-27vs WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ CallerosLost 02
L#1 DoublesRian Kalklosch / Kelly Posthumus vs Rebecca Canales / Maritza Acuna6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLisa Bresnahan / Ashley Jacobs vs Stephanie Grado / Teresa Vega2-6, 3-6
2026-04-24vs SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesLisa Bicker / Paula Schafer vs Jill Bruckart / Jessica Bunster0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohanna Palomino vs Miriam Mceachern1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Carr / Kate Kassar vs Cecilia Blair / Michelle Anilao3-6, 5-7
2026-04-06vs SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ JimenezLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Kassar / Johanna Palomino vs Paulina Bejarano / Giovanna Jimenez4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Carr vs Monica Olivares6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAshley Jacobs / Amanda Feghali vs Brigitte Cohen / Ashton Ellis4-6, 2-6
2026-03-30vs SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ FreedmanLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate Kassar / Kelly Posthumus vs Sarah Narhi / Christina Warren3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJohanna Palomino vs Rebecca Lamanna6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAmanda Feghali / Lisa Bresnahan vs Robin Delaney / Olga Freedman3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · SD - Women - 2.5 (Monday)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SoCal/Blair/18&Over2.5W6218613154
2WC SD 2.5 Mtn View/ Calleros62141022178
3SD 2.5 Sunbow Park (2:1)/ Cruz62131128211
4SD 2.5 Balboa TC/ Freedman35111329220
5SD 2.5 Coronado TC/ Jimenez3591532226
6SD 2.5 Peninsula TC/ Williams26101431235
7SD 2.5 LJBTC/ Feuerstein2691533237

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Amy Carr
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.33
Kate Kassar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Alli Thurman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Amanda Feghali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Ashley Jacobs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Carly Feuerstein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Johanna Palomino
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Tiffany Soriano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Posthumus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Bicker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lisa Bresnahan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nikki Singer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Schafer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rian Kalklosch
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Kassar + Amy Carr213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Amy Carr
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
Kate Kassar
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Alli Thurman
2W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Amanda Feghali
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Ashley Jacobs
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Carly Feuerstein
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Johanna Palomino
2W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Tiffany Soriano
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Kelly Posthumus
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Bicker
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Lisa Bresnahan
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nikki Singer
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Schafer
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rian Kalklosch
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.