Teams

GEPTA-4.0-Adult/18+W(Abbud)(CCC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.44 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Adriana Aldrete
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 4
3.41
Ani Ramos
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.20
Georgina Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 29%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Claudia Abbud
usually #3 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 37% · published 3.5
3.06
Elva Malooly
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.90
Carmen-Gloria Yamal
usually #3 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.80
Fadia Ghaleb
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3
Gianna Acevedo
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Jennifer Malley
published
Juliet Mattingly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Lia Davalos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Linda Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Marcia Zaragoza
usually #1 Doubles 42%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Olga Carrasco
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Priscilla Cossentino
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sarvelia Diaz
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Shannon Thomson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nassar + Juliet Mattingly15855% games+8.5% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Elva Malooly4354% games+7.9% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Shannon Thomson4549% games+6.4% vs expected
Lia Davalos + Carmen-Gloria Yamal2546% games+6.2% vs expected
Linda Nassar + Olga Carrasco3252% games+5.2% vs expected
Elva Malooly + Sarvelia Diaz6848% games+5.0% vs expected
Carmen-Gloria Yamal + Fadia Ghaleb6159% games+4.4% vs expected
Claudia Abbud + Juliet Mattingly6649% games+3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Adriana Aldrete
32W–36L career · 13 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Ani Ramos
29W–28L career · 16 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Georgina Munoz
33W–79L career · 16 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Claudia Abbud
52W–103L career · 19 lines in 2025
15%85%<1%
3.13
3.5
Elva Malooly
23W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carmen-Gloria Yamal
47W–62L career · 10 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
2.90
3
Fadia Ghaleb
13W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Gianna Acevedo
2W–7L career · type M · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jennifer Malley
18W–28L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Juliet Mattingly
91W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lia Davalos
24W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Nassar
60W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marcia Zaragoza
35W–63L career · 12 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olga Carrasco
32W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Priscilla Cossentino
33W–55L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarvelia Diaz
49W–88L career · 15 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Thomson
64W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.