Teams

Walnut Creek TC 18AW3.5B-DT

2023 ADULT 18&Over Daytime · Women 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
L#1 DoublesJennifer Davis / Wendy Thomas vs Tami Lightle / Tammie Snyder5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Heidi Temkin
published
3.66
3.63
Viviana Meyer
published
3.42
Jill Carlstrom
published
3.41
Sunita Mistry
published
3.36
Michelle Bauer
published
3.36
3.33
Shawn Young
published
3.33
Susie Hansen
published
3.32
Allene Rognon
published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Davis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kerry Marx
published
3.14
Yolla Elahmadie
published
3.14
Trish Nornhold
published
3.13
Lea Baldacci
published
3.03
Christi Deakin
published 3.5
Jana Vojdani
published
Rachel Gilchrist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sunita Mistry + Viviana Meyer5255% games+6.3% vs expected
Jill Carlstrom + Susie Hansen4160% games+1.1% vs expected
Shawn Young + Trish Nornhold224 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Gilchrist + Trish Nornhold044 matchesnot enough data
Heidi Temkin + Sunita Mistry033 matchesnot enough data
Yolla Elahmadie + Jill Carlstrom123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heidi Temkin
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cortny Christensen
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%1%
3.66
Viviana Meyer
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
Jill Carlstrom
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.42
Sunita Mistry
18W–14L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Michelle Bauer
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Caroline D Sherbourne
9W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Shawn Young
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
Susie Hansen
20W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Allene Rognon
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Jennifer Davis
49W–61L career · 1 line in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Kerry Marx
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.15
Yolla Elahmadie
5W–18L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Trish Nornhold
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%1%
3.14
Lea Baldacci
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christi Deakin
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
Jana Vojdani
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Gilchrist
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.