Teams

Love All

2022 Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter · Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-23vs RodmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesKim Rehmann / Cindee Smith vs Nina Price / Lynda Suffoletta5-7, 6-0
2022-03-21vs LarsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesKim Rehmann / Cindee Smith vs Kimberly Klimek / Heather Schreiber4-6, 3-6
2022-03-14vs PortoWon 10
W#2 DoublesBridget Foist / Cindee Smith vs Tina Petzold / Jennifer Snyder6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2022-03-10vs Block/CopelandLost 01
L#3 DoublesCindee Smith / Karyn Ferber vs Julie Alter / Sherry Dunda4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-02-23vs KorolkoffWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindee Smith / Kim Rehmann vs Samantha Corrigan / Mary Beth Etherton6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-11vs Manor 4.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCindee Smith / Karyn Ferber vs Sherri Dixon / Melisssa Hacopian2-6, 3-6
2022-01-19vs RodmanWon 10
W#3 DoublesCindee Smith / Patricia Rose vs Erika Psacharopoulos / Maureen K Webster1-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other Women's Day Winter 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bridget Foist
published 4
3.67
Kathi Teitelbaum
published
3.54
Kim Rehmann
published
3.33
Cindee Smith
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.31
Patricia Rose
published
3.30
Julia Latein-Kimmig
published
3.27
Joy Biciocchi
published
E Molly Hemsley
published 3.5
3.17
Sandy Horowitz
published
2.97
Veronique Kessler
published
Jill Lavin
published
Kay Han
published
Susie Barnello
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bridget Foist
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathi Teitelbaum
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
Kim Rehmann
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Cindee Smith
49W–38L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
Patricia Rose
6W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Julia Latein-Kimmig
14W–19L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Joy Biciocchi
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
E Molly Hemsley
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Horowitz
13W–20L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Veronique Kessler
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
2.97
Jill Lavin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kay Han
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Susie Barnello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.