Teams

Covington/55s/6.5/SC

2026 Man · Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day

13 players · average NTRP 3.14 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Southern Combo 55 & Over - Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Cherie Verdigets
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 28% · published 3.5
3.17
Amy Arthur
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.93
Alison Beebe
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.92
Angelique Daigle
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.80
Debbie Morvant
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3
2.80
Darci Senner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.66
Ann Marie Covington
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
Kim Osborn
usually #1 Doubles 65%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Ann Bruno
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Melinda Carmeli
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
Rhonda Simmons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Trisha Rovira
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debbie Morvant + Ann Marie Covington134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cherie Verdigets
18W–13L career · 18 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Amy Arthur
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Alison Beebe
64W–33L career · 35 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Angelique Daigle
12W–4L career · 14 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
3
Debbie Morvant
7W–19L career · 11 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.80
3
Darci Senner
4W–2L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Ann Marie Covington
19W–25L career · 14 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
2.66
Kim Osborn
28W–24L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Kieffer Schwartz
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Mary Ann Bruno
14W–16L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Melinda Carmeli
12W–15L career · 9 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rhonda Simmons
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Trisha Rovira
11W–10L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.