Teams

Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&F

2026 Mixed 40 & Over 3.5, 4.5 · 3.5 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 3.12 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-27vs Booth/Horne/MH/LR&FLost 12
L#1 DoublesCassandra Jestice / Joseph Jestice vs Grant Talbot / Cara Barber3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Blagg / John Gibbs vs Scott Booth / Nicole Horne6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Luck / Jillian Bemis vs Amy McKay / Walt McKay4-6, 5-7
2026-07-20vs Booth/Horne/MH/LR&FLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Blagg / John Gibbs vs Cara Barber / Grant Talbot6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCassandra Jestice / Joseph Jestice vs Nicole Horne / Jody Horne7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCara Coleman / Bradley Coleman vs Amy McKay / Thomas Czanstkowski3-6, 5-7
2026-07-20vs Booth/Horne/MH/LR&FLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Luck / Jillian Bemis vs Grant Talbot / Cara Barber2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJoseph Jestice / Cassandra Jestice vs Nicole Horne / Jody Horne5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCara Coleman / Bradley Coleman vs Allison Booth / Thomas Czanstkowski2-6, 3-6
2026-07-13vs Booth/Horne/MH/LR&FWon 21
W#1 DoublesCassandra Jestice / Joseph Jestice vs Amy McKay / Walt McKay6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Luck / Jillian Bemis vs Nicole Horne / Jody Horne1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Blagg / John Gibbs vs Allison Booth / Scott Booth6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Booth/Horne/MH/LR&F318410105
2Bemis/Luck/MH/LR&F134816120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Joseph Jestice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
John Gibbs
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Sarah Blagg
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Jillian Bemis
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Bradley Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
David Luck
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.77
Cara Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Cassandra Jestice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cassandra Jestice + Joseph Jestice134 matchesnot enough data
Cara Coleman + Bradley Coleman224 matchesnot enough data
John Gibbs + Sarah Blagg303 matchesnot enough data
Jillian Bemis + David Luck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joseph Jestice
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
John Gibbs
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Sarah Blagg
6W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jillian Bemis
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Bradley Coleman
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3.5
David Luck
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
3
Cara Coleman
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Cassandra Jestice
1W–3L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.