Teams

LCC

2023 Polk Adult 18 & Over - Women · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesSheryl Norman / Anna Clark vs Hayley Hurd / Rhonda Harris6-2, 6-4
2023-02-21vs Beerman - R. EspitiaLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheryl Norman / Lauren Clark vs Gwen Wearing-Davis / Svetlana Darrow3-6, 5-7
2023-02-14vs Beerman Simply Smashing - T. LoveWon 10
W#2 DoublesShannon Miles / Sheryl Norman vs Tina Marcewicz / Rosa Jean6-3, 6-0
2023-02-07Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKim Ruthven / Sheryl Norman vs Lauren Mason / Amber Smith1-6, 1-6
2023-01-31vs Beerman - R. CoultonLost 01
L#2 SinglesSheryl Norman vs Allison Sorenson0-6, 3-6
2023-01-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesSheryl Norman / Kim Ruthven vs Mary Ellen Guthrie / Rhonda Harris7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-17vs WHC Raquettes - G. TardyLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarey Campbell / Brittany Craig vs Sandra McWhorter / Jan Hyman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Kerrie Hall
published
3.43
Brittany Craig
published 3.5
3.25
Lauren Clark
published
3.04
Lauren Lloyd
published
3.04
Caroline Miller
published 3
2.96
Shannon Miles
published
2.78
Sheryl Norman
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Carey Campbell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.72
Ginny Houghton
published 3
2.65
Brandy Lansford
published 3
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
published
2.64
Sandra Campisi
published
2.53
Bevin Strickland
published 3
2.50
Deanna Bayless
published 3
Summer Strawbridge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Lloyd + Caroline Miller314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kerrie Hall
38W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.59
3.5
Brittany Craig
19W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.43
Lauren Clark
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
Lauren Lloyd
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Caroline Miller
20W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
Shannon Miles
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Sheryl Norman
53W–65L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Carey Campbell
15W–43L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
3
Ginny Houghton
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Brandy Lansford
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Lamanda Petcoff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
2.65
Sandra Campisi
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%<1%
2.64
3
Bevin Strickland
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Deanna Bayless
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Summer Strawbridge
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.