Teams

Su.Braga18A

2025 Capital Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.93 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-05vs Be.Pegram18AWon 31
W#1 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Cassy Albertson vs Francie LaRue / Cara Garrett4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Shannon Vinson6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelly Conlin / Michelle Staub vs Sarah Herring / Sara Fitzpatrick3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMegan Slocum vs Beth Pegram6-4, 6-4
2025-04-13vs Na.Rodriguez18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesMegan Slocum / Chrissy Hartsfield vs Ashley Resta / Caroline Margolis2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Soleim / Laurel Saunders vs Taylor Meyer / Sara Walker6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Bass / Tina Goertz vs Angela Myers / Shannon Marconi5-7, 2-6
2025-04-09vs Br.Robinson18A3.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesKelly Conlin / Michelle Staub vs Paige Boyles / Erika Plant3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Cassy Albertson vs Brittany Robinson / Wendy Roberts6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Cox / Suzanne Braga vs Ellen Zimmerman / Melissa Thomas6-4, 6-4
2025-04-06vs Br.Humphrey18ALost 23
L#1 DoublesSarah Soleim / Laurel Saunders vs Sara Lilley / Catherine Wilborne3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Rebecca O'Brien7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Sarah Copley vs Molly Ehrlich / Liz Wansley6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMichelle Staub vs Maggie Finney3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTina Goertz / Megan Slocum vs Christine Harris / Mary Long7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-27vs Cl.Owens18AWon 21
L#1 DoublesSarah Soleim / Megan Slocum vs Tami Hollingsworth / Courtney Hodgson6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Jessica Jones6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChrissy Hartsfield / Michelle Staub vs Sarah Cooke / Kendall Stevens6-1, 6-4
2025-03-23vs St.Gupton18AWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Sarah Soleim vs Katherine Kleisch / Sydnor Coffman6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Braga / Kathryn White vs Katherine Franck / Caroline Patella6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah Copley / Tina Goertz vs Mary Ellen Crawley / Ellen Shook6-4, 6-2
2025-03-09vs Je.VanCampen18ALost 12
L#1 DoublesCassy Albertson / Sarah Copley vs Merab Puleo / Karen Southern2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMegan Slocum vs Michelle Gessner6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTina Goertz / Lindsay Bass vs Josette Huntress / Michele Lagerstedt1-6, 0-6
2025-03-02vs In.NavarroGalisteo18ALost 04
L#1 DoublesLaurel Saunders / Sarah Soleim vs Carter Grimes / Clare Bonifant4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCassy Albertson / Megan Slocum vs Inma Navarro Galisteo / Lee Anne Oxford7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesSuzanne Braga vs Dana Aderhold6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Cox / Michelle Staub vs Caroline Beaird / Heather Mauzy5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Laurel Saunders
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Sarah Soleim
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Kathryn White
published
2.71
Megan Slocum
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.70
Suzanne Braga
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3
2.69
Cassy Albertson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.68
Sarah Copley
published
2.61
Michelle Staub
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.60
Lindsay Bass
published
2.40
Jill Orr
published
2.35
Tina Goertz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Braga + Megan Slocum3252% games+1.3% vs expected
Tina Goertz + Laurel Saunders1745% games+1.3% vs expected
Sarah Soleim + Laurel Saunders6549% games+0.0% vs expected
Tina Goertz + Sarah Soleim0834% gamesnot enough data
Tina Goertz + Megan Slocum1445% gamesnot enough data
Lindsay Bass + Cassy Albertson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Laurel Saunders
40W–43L career · 12 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
2.86
3
Sarah Soleim
22W–50L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
Kathryn White
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
3
Megan Slocum
32W–45L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Suzanne Braga
36W–55L career · 6 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Cassy Albertson
40W–39L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
2.69
Sarah Copley
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Michelle Staub
53W–90L career · 5 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.61
Lindsay Bass
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
Jill Orr
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Tina Goertz
83W–199L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.