Teams

Disruptors

2026 Tri-Level League · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.30 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-11vs Let's Talk About SetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesTalena Lorren / Lindsay Houchen vs Danielle Spencer / Fouadee Kammoun Fajardo3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristina Li / Kayla Fonger vs Mariela Monagas / Dalia Martinez6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKatie Vincent / Jane Spears vs Martha Dellano / TANIA SALAZAR7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-10vs Let's Talk About SetsWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristina Merritt / Lindsay Houchen vs Julie Alvarez / Danielle Spencer6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Ortiz / Christina Li vs Mariela Monagas / Brigette Beavers6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJane Spears / Johnette Thomas vs Claudia Villarreal / TANIA SALAZAR6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-10-05vs Let's Talk About SetsLost 01
L#1 DoublesNancy Almaraz / Veronica Flores vs Brigette Beavers / Mariela Monagas6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Trio AmigosLost 01
L#1 DoublesKellie Johnson / Nancy Almaraz vs Hannah Bean / Rachel Gravel5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Lauren Villegas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Christina Merritt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.31
Claudia Samaniego
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.13
Alexandria Vafadari
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Talena Lorren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Nancy Almaraz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Kristin Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.83
Andrea Turk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Kayla Fonger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Christina Li
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Rebecca Alarid
published
3.51
Katie Vincent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Johnette Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Jane Spears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lindsay Houchen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Villegas
28W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
4.46
4.5
Christina Merritt
9W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Claudia Samaniego
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Alexandria Vafadari
22W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
Talena Lorren
4W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Nancy Almaraz
28W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
Kristin Ortiz
38W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Andrea Turk
52W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Kayla Fonger
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Christina Li
6W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Alarid
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.68
Katie Vincent
32W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
Johnette Thomas
19W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.50
Jane Spears
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.44
Kimberly Murillo-Armstrong
16W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lindsay Houchen
4W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.