Teams

Parks/FS/CM

2026 Adult 18 & Over Spring 2 League · 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-05-04vs Bailey/BV/KTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Twiss / Riley Palmer vs Jeff Gravette / Michael Cochran6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-05-03vs Abdin/Fayetteville/FACLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaleb Day / Riley Palmer vs Marty Baker / Alexander Oshen1-6, 0-6
2026-04-18vs Cockrell/Bentonville/MRCWon 10
W#2 DoublesCaleb Day / Riley Palmer vs Grant Patterson / Matthew Gross7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-06vs Malayappan/Bentonville/INDWon 10
W#3 DoublesAndrew Fano / Riley Palmer vs Ramesh Subramanian / Madan Mohan Challa2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-06vs Moore/FS/CMWon 31
W#1 DoublesRiley Palmer / Jonathan Gray vs David Humphrey / Martyn Parker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJacob Frueh vs David Moore3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrooks Leding / Steve Drake vs Alan Carlisle / Josh McGuire3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChad Parks / Michael Tursky vs Christopher Hooks / Roberto Tarin6-2, 6-1
2026-03-30vs Moore/FS/CMWon 31
W#1 DoublesJacob Frueh / Riley Palmer vs David Moore / David Humphrey6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThai Tran / Brooks Leding vs Curtis Abbott / Josh Carroll4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesIan Caldarera vs Alan Carlisle4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Tursky / Dusan Stojanovic vs Roberto Tarin / Josh McGuire6-0, 6-2
2026-03-18vs Heien-Short/Fayetteville/SRCLost 01
L#2 SinglesRiley Palmer vs Jacob Kendall4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-03-05vs Marcotte/FS/CMLost 13
W#1 DoublesJacob Frueh / Riley Palmer vs Chol Hyun Park / Larry Isch1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMichael Tursky vs Robert Remy0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteve Drake / Brooks Leding vs Mark Hoskyn / Charles Warren3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDusan Stojanovic / Brandon Oneal vs Bernie Manard / James Willis5-7, 2-6
2026-03-02vs Moore/FS/CMWon 40
W#1 DoublesJacob Frueh / Riley Palmer vs Alan Carlisle / Curtis Abbott6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesIan Caldarera vs Josh McGuire6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteve Drake / Brooks Leding vs Roberto Tarin / Christopher Hooks6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrandon Oneal / Dusan Stojanovic vs Martyn Parker / David Humphrey6-2, 7-5
2026-02-26vs Marcotte/FS/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacob Frueh / Riley Palmer vs Nathan Marcotte / Robert Remy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesBrooks Leding / Steve Drake vs Brandon Richmond / Mark Hoskyn3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrandon Oneal / Chad Parks vs Shane Irgens / Varun Gampa6-7, 1-6
2026-02-19vs Marcotte/FS/CMLost 13
W#1 DoublesRiley Palmer / Jonathan Gray vs Dzung Vu / Nathan Marcotte7-5, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJacob Frueh vs Chol Hyun Park2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Tursky / Steve Drake vs Mark Hoskyn / Brandon Richmond0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChad Parks / Brooks Leding vs Larry Isch / James Willis2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Marcotte/FS/CM6024615182
2Parks/FS/CM33141638280
3Moore/FS/CM0652552332

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Dusan Stojanovic
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Riley Palmer
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.27
Jacob Frueh
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.19
Brandon Oneal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Michael Tursky
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.10
Brooks Leding
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.01
Steve Drake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Chad Parks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ian Caldarera
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riley Palmer + Jacob Frueh6255% games+5.4% vs expected
Steve Drake + Brooks Leding134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dusan Stojanovic
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Riley Palmer
11W–5L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Jacob Frueh
8W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brandon Oneal
1W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Michael Tursky
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Brooks Leding
1W–5L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Steve Drake
4W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Chad Parks
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Ian Caldarera
3W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.