Teams

Monroe - Mambo Combo

2025 Howard Combo · Howard Combo 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-23vs Quinlan - Tennis the MenaceWon 10
W#1 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Deborah Wright vs Fabiola Custodio / Wendy Hubbert3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-10-19vs Twele - Rays of SunshineWon 20
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Deborah Wright vs Vy Nguyen / Allison Schiefer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeslie MacFarlane / Kathleen Cullins vs Patricia Daugherty / Jianmei Zhu7-6, 5-5
2025-10-07vs Painter - Over Served 6.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Shayuth / Deborah Wright vs Amanda ODonovan / Kathryn Painter1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Brooke Santry / Melissa Zohdi2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDonna Guarino / Toni Vanderputten vs Allison Mathis / Katie Wolven1-6, 2-6
2025-10-04vs Albert - Shot SistersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Deborah Wright vs Elizabeth Hatton / Shari Albert6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammi Molavi / Toni Vanderputten vs Renee Plazak / Diane Ruggiero7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathleen Cullins / Leslie MacFarlane vs Cheryl Royce / Jennifer Schied7-6, 6-4
W#1 DoublesSarah Perkins / DIANE CASANOVA vs Julia Heeter / Kara Regal2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Hagen / Toni Vanderputten vs Morgan Miller / Karen Spano4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Guarino / Leslie MacFarlane vs Sarah Boyd / Lisa Martinez2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-26vs Battista - Net Setters ComboSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Deborah Wright vs Kathy Tuckey / Julie Cabaniss7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMelinda Shayuth / Kathleen Cullins vs Colleen Knapp / Brenda Poore2-6, 1-6
2025-09-18vs Quinlan - Tennis the MenaceSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Sarah Perkins vs Gena Conron / Mihaela Pertea1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Linda Shaffer vs Laura Lewandowski / Susanne Gibbons6-7, 6-4
2025-09-15vs Painter - Over Served 6.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Chrisco Andrews / Kathleen Cullins vs Allison Mathis / Nicole Oxenham6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Meghan Leimenstoll / Katie Wolven0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMelinda Shayuth / Sandy Friedman vs Kathryn Painter / Sara Kowalczyk0-6, 2-6
2025-09-09vs Albert - Shot SistersWon 21
W#1 DoublesDIANE CASANOVA / Deborah Wright vs Amy Champion / Cheryl Royce7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Michele Barron / Anne McKissick7-6, 5-4
L#3 DoublesKathleen Cullins / Leslie MacFarlane vs Karen Altman / Jennifer Schied1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 DoublesStephanie Ruskin / Melinda Shayuth vs Morgan Miller / Shelley Swaim3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesToni Vanderputten / Sandy Friedman vs Katie Young / Karen Spano3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Combo 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Donna Guarino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kathleen Cullins
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Linda Shaffer
published
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Ann Hagen
published 3.5
3.04
Sandy Friedman
published
2.97
DIANE CASANOVA
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Susan Baker
published
2.92
Julie Chrisco Andrews
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Toni Vanderputten
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.72
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.69
Melinda Shayuth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Arianne Monroe
published 3
2.63
Leslie MacFarlane
published
Sarah Perkins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammi Molavi + Stephanie Ruskin171948% games−1.5% vs expected
Stephanie Ruskin + DIANE CASANOVA4258% gamesnot enough data
Donna Guarino + Stephanie Ruskin134 matchesnot enough data
Julie Chrisco Andrews + Susan Baker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Donna Guarino
136W–101L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Kathleen Cullins
63W–103L career · 5 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Linda Shaffer
18W–17L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Tammi Molavi
114W–131L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Ann Hagen
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Sandy Friedman
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
3.04
3
DIANE CASANOVA
123W–105L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Susan Baker
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.94
3
Julie Chrisco Andrews
155W–97L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Toni Vanderputten
97W–155L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.73
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–154L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Melinda Shayuth
66W–88L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Arianne Monroe
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Leslie MacFarlane
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sarah Perkins
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.