Teams

Harris - Lawn and Tennis

Sandhills Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Combo 55 & Over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-15vs Irby - CCNCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Howard / Kelly Rader vs MaryBryan Morgan / Murtis Worth7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLynn Floyd / Sandra Florell vs Michele Keel / Lisa Cook3-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesEllen Harris / Jenifir Bruno vs Amie Irby / Cornelia Morris6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2026-08-01vs Nixon - Legacy LakesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Lynn Goldhammer vs Del Metcalf / Donna Hicks2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Hastings / Lori Hercules vs Sandra Barnhardt / Ann Tucker2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesLynn Floyd / Sandra Florell vs Lisa Nixon / Cindy Garrison4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Mary Howard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Lisa Kirkwood
published
3.23
Amy Hastings
published 3.5
3.22
Marcy Isenhart
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Jenifir Bruno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Jami Sitzler
published
3.02
Lynn Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
2.92
Kumson Karsner
published
2.90
Kelly Rader
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Sandra Florell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Lori Hercules
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.66
Lynn Goldhammer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Goldhammer + Marcy Isenhart0631% games−3.0% vs expected
Lynn Floyd + Sandra Florell3350% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Florell + Lori Hercules3342% gamesnot enough data
Kumson Karsner + Marcy Isenhart2450% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Goldhammer + Lori Hercules3350% gamesnot enough data
Mary Howard + Lori Hercules3249% gamesnot enough data
Jami Sitzler + Lisa Kirkwood3251% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Florell + Marcy Isenhart134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Howard
49W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Lisa Kirkwood
12W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Amy Hastings
14W–6L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.23
3.5
Marcy Isenhart
11W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Jenifir Bruno
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Jami Sitzler
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Lynn Floyd
33W–45L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
3
Sondra Montesi Yates
43W–75L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
2.96
Kumson Karsner
12W–15L career · no lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.92
Kelly Rader
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Sandra Florell
18W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lori Hercules
20W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Lynn Goldhammer
20W–81L career · 1 line in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.