Teams

Burkwood Decker

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Weekend Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-06-01vs Willow Oaks Granger DuntonLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Hart / Janice McGarity vs Nina Moore / Irina Schaffernoth2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-20vs MRTC Williams 4.5 LadiesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJanice McGarity / Ashley Hart vs Olga Sukhova / Kristin Tetterton2-6, 4-6
2024-05-18vs Belmont Angel/GreinerSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Oatts vs Andrea Rahal5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAshley Hart / Janice McGarity vs Courtney Greiner / Karna Hyman6-1, 6-0
2024-05-11vs MidAtlantic/Berens/Adult18&Over4.5WSplit 11
L#2 SinglesSarah Oatts vs Anna Shea0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesJanice McGarity / Heather Griggs vs Elizabeth Kelly / Margie Ray6-1, 6-2
2024-05-01vs SCC Spiller/AlleyLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Hart / Janice McGarity vs Karen Franks / Lauren Palmer3-6, 4-6
2024-04-20vs Willow Oaks Granger DuntonLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Oatts vs Peyton Curdts2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-04-13vs Belmont Angel/GreinerLost 01
L#2 SinglesSarah Oatts vs Delaney Rhodus7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.5 Weekend Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Ashley Hart
published 4.5
4.21
Erin Decker
published
4.07
Lindsey O'Kane
published
3.99
Casey Carnohan
published 4
3.97
Susan Powell
published
3.96
Janice McGarity
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.93
Sarah Oatts
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.85
Courtney Booth
published 4
3.73
Kim Weis
published
3.44
Mary Davis
published
Emily Edens
published
Rebecca Loos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Davis + Ashley Hart4172% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Hart
21W–17L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
4.33
Erin Decker
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
Lindsey O'Kane
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Casey Carnohan
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Susan Powell
32W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.97
4.5
Janice McGarity
70W–56L career · 5 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Sarah Oatts
80W–60L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Courtney Booth
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.85
Kim Weis
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Mary Davis
17W–5L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.44
Emily Edens
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Rebecca Loos
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.