Teams

Belden

2023 Summer Flex Singles · 4.0 Women

1 player · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-08-06vs CNolanLost 01
L#1 SinglesKalynn Belden vs Colleen Nolan3-6, 3-6
2023-08-05vs vandeGriendWon 10
W#1 SinglesKalynn Belden vs RENEE VANDEGRIEND6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CNolan5050227
2AdinaTalpos4242430
3Sharon Mathew2121223
4Belden1111214
5Parks1212425
6fogle1212535
7KH000000
8Plombon000000
9Ossanna000000
10Mottski0101212
11Kathleen Mannion0202425
12vandeGriend0303636

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Kalynn Belden
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kalynn Belden
60W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.