Teams

Seminole Lake Rhodes

2022 Pinellas Adult 40 & Over Spring Weekend · 4.0 W Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-11vs ELW SanchezSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiana Zarreke / Debra Hinners vs Monica Sanchez / Suzanne Pedone5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMartyne LaDuke / Cheryl Briske vs Sigrid Bratic / Morgan Domson2-6, 4-6
2022-06-04vs Safety Harbor ArmagostWon 10
W#1 DoublesDiana Zarreke / Martyne LaDuke vs Amy Warren / Dori Hazama2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-05-07vs ELW SanchezLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Briske / Martyne LaDuke vs Cindi Crockett / Lisa Coyne7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDebra Hinners / Mickie Gelestor vs Melinda London / Suzanne Pedone2-6, 3-6
2022-04-30vs Safety Harbor ArmagostLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartyne LaDuke / Cheryl Briske vs Dori Hazama / Cindy Swartz2-6, 3-6
2022-04-23vs Bardmoor PawlowskiWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Zarreke / Debra Hinners vs Marnie Bauer / Irene Nasworthy7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJessica Tas vs Terry Wilson6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2022-04-09vs Pinellas - McMullen 40-LuvLost 01
L#2 DoublesMartyne LaDuke / Diana Zarreke vs Kelley Cargle / Becky Ogburn3-6, 4-6
2022-04-02vs Bardmoor PawlowskiWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartyne LaDuke / Cheryl Briske vs Cheryl Pawlowski / Mary Jacobs4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Diana Zarreke
published 4
3.60
Jessica Tas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.57
Martyne LaDuke
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Debra Hinners
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.29
Mary Egan-Lorigan
published
Barbi Bozich
published 3.5
Mickie Gelestor
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debra Hinners + Diana Zarreke1638% games−5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Zarreke
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Jessica Tas
34W–24L career · 7 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Martyne LaDuke
28W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Debra Hinners
37W–87L career · 3 lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.52
Mary Egan-Lorigan
15W–48L career · no lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
3.29
3.5
Barbi Bozich
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mickie Gelestor
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.