Teams

Sequoyah/Debi Williams

2023 Sequoyah Southern Combo 18 & Over - Winter '22 · Ladies 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.29 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-03-08vs Sequoyah/Tina JonesWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim Lamb / Jaide Johns vs Rebecca Camboia / Jewel Akpose7-5, 6-1
2023-03-01vs Sequoyah/Tina JonesLost 01
L#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Ann Carroll vs Charlie Lewis / Tara McFarlane5-7, 6-7
2023-02-15vs Sequoyah/Tina JonesLost 02
L#1 DoublesKim Lamb / Danita Abernathy vs Rebecca Camboia / Jewel Akpose6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMargie DeShon / Debi Williams vs Bonnie Burden / Karlene Welty4-6, 1-6
2023-02-08vs Sequoyah/Tina JonesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDebi Williams / Margie DeShon vs Kerrigan LeBoeuf / Charlie Lewis4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnn Carroll / Kim Lamb vs Karlene Welty / Bonnie Burden6-4, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ladies 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Calli Davis
published 4
3.51
Kim Lamb
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.34
Jaide Johns
published 3.5
3.18
Sket Angland
published
3.17
Meghan Wells
published
2.98
Carol Martinez
published 3
2.85
Debi Williams
published 3
Danita Abernathy
published 3
2.70
Simone Ford
published
2.58
Ann Carroll
published 3
Margie DeShon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Whitney Paradis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Simone Ford + Debi Williams6260% games+16.8% vs expected
Kim Lamb + Margie DeShon5258% gamesnot enough data
Calli Davis + Kim Lamb6086% gamesnot enough data
Carol Martinez + Debi Williams134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Calli Davis
62W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.95
3.5
Kim Lamb
215W–88L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Jaide Johns
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Sket Angland
32W–38L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Meghan Wells
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Carol Martinez
55W–25L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Debi Williams
30W–39L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Danita Abernathy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Simone Ford
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Ann Carroll
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
Margie DeShon
203W–156L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Whitney Paradis
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.