Teams

Racquet Power

2024 Forty West Adult 18 & Over · Forty West Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-05-18vs Above the NetLost 12
L#1 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai vs Kathy Baruch / Samantha Norris4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Cristina Sanchez / Rosalba Davis vs Nancy Trimble / Karen Liberto4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBarbara Wertman / Leslie Mansfield vs Suzanne Arena / Mary Ann Blyth6-1, 7-6
2024-05-11vs Above the NetWon 20
W#1 DoublesRosalba Davis / Linda Tsai vs Mary Ann Blyth / Zola Allen6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Valerie Mockapetris vs Cheryl Cook-Auerbach / Brenda Crowe1-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-04vs Above the NetSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Amerault / Valerie Mockapetris vs Mary Ann Blyth / Patricia Demme4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulia Heeter vs Millette Miller6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2024-04-20vs Above the NetSplit 11
L#1 DoublesValerie Mockapetris / Julia Heeter vs Samantha Norris / Jean Flack4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Jeanine Parker vs Cheryl Cook-Auerbach / Eunice Winfree7-6, 4-3
2024-04-13vs Above the NetLost 04
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Amerault / Barbara Wertman vs Kathy Baruch / Mary Ann Blyth3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJulia Heeter vs Rachel Ouyang2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Valerie Mockapetris vs Patricia Demme / Jean Flack3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeanine Parker / Lama Shikani vs Linda Rotiroti / Eunice Winfree0-6, 4-6
2024-04-06vs Above the NetLost 02
L#1 DoublesBonnie Bernard / Julia Heeter vs Kathy Baruch / Samantha Norris5-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Doody / Rosalba Davis vs Mary Ann Blyth / Patricia Demme3-6, 5-7
2024-03-23vs Above the NetWon 21
W#1 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Linda Tsai vs Patricia Demme / Brenda Crowe6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Dettmer / Lama Shikani vs Nancy Trimble / Jean Flack2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Doody / Rosalba Davis vs Suzanne Arena / Emily Trochimowicz6-2, 6-4
2024-03-16vs Above the NetWon 20
W#1 DoublesBonnie Bernard / Barbara Wertman vs Kathy Baruch / Samantha Norris4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Doody / Rosalba Davis vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-03-09vs Above the NetWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrooke Davidson / Valerie Mockapetris vs Eunice Winfree / Nancy Trimble6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesJulia Heeter vs Zola Allen2-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesGENA CHUNG / Maria Cristina Sanchez vs Karen Liberto / Rachel Ouyang6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLama Shikani / Elizabeth Amerault vs Suzanne Arena / Emily Trochimowicz6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Forty West Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Julia Heeter
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Brooke Davidson
published 3.5
3.35
Linda Tsai
published
3.29
GENA CHUNG
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Bonnie Bernard
published 3.5
3.23
Barbara Wertman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Leslie Mansfield
published
3.15
Rosalba Davis
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.13
Elizabeth Amerault
published
3.09
Valerie Mockapetris
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.08
Lama Shikani
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
3.01
Deborah Dettmer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Thu Pham
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Dettmer + Valerie Mockapetris232150% games−2.1% vs expected
GENA CHUNG + Linda Tsai314 matchesnot enough data
GENA CHUNG + Deborah Dettmer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Julia Heeter
72W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Brooke Davidson
16W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
Linda Tsai
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
GENA CHUNG
122W–130L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Bonnie Bernard
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Barbara Wertman
89W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Leslie Mansfield
36W–23L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Rosalba Davis
38W–46L career · 5 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
Elizabeth Amerault
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Valerie Mockapetris
129W–104L career · 5 lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.09
3.5
Lama Shikani
88W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Maria Cristina Sanchez
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Deborah Dettmer
167W–205L career · 4 lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.01
Thu Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.