Teams

Ka.Rollinson18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-29vs Me.Moore18CWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Mills / Heather Johnson vs Nina Schweitzer / Ashley Heavner7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJulie Ferrer / Melinda Daly vs Jessica Glennon / Meagan Moore7-5, 7-5
2025-09-15vs Li.Singler18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelinda Daly / Julie Ferrer vs Jena Taft / Elizabeth Vieira6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Malone / Heather Johnson vs Matilda Marshall / Leah Beatty4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMadison Freeman / Meaghan Quindlen vs Margie Kooman / Alexandra Quinn2-6, 4-6
2025-08-26vs Ja.Stephan18CLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaggie Harber / Allison Mills vs Sarah Bruckner / Hayes McCaffrey4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesRebecca Gronroos / Lisa Sullivan vs Samantha Siano / Jamie Stephan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Rollinson / Meaghan Quindlen vs Rachael Van / Kelly Norman3-6, 4-6
2025-08-18vs El.Robinson18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesRebecca Gronroos / Nada Milkovich vs Emily Funderburk / Laura Noah6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMelinda Daly / Maggie Harber vs Caryn McNeill / Elizabeth Robinson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHeather Johnson / Julie Ferrer vs Katie Landi / Sally Wooten6-7, 3-6
2025-08-04vs Ke.Baltzer18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNada Milkovich / Rebecca Gronroos vs Ashley Stephenson / Lauren Shelby6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Mills / Margaret Malone vs Kari Marotta / Susan Gentry2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.44
Rebecca Gronroos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Nada Milkovich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Melinda Daly
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Meaghan Quindlen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.28
Allison Mills
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Maggie Harber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.24
Julie Ferrer
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.10
Kathleen Rollinson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.87
Margaret Malone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Madison Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rebecca Gronroos
6W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44
Nada Milkovich
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%68%32%
2.43
Melinda Daly
7W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%80%20%
2.38
Meaghan Quindlen
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.33
2.5
Allison Mills
5W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%94%6%
2.28
Maggie Harber
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Julie Ferrer
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
Kathleen Rollinson
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Margaret Malone
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.87
Madison Freeman
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.