Teams

LRC-Enslow

2023 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-28vs TLTC-Crook-Love Hurts 2.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole Enslow / Stephanie Chinn vs Anneliese Johnson / Karen Oie4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJihui Han vs Lauren Treleven5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLinda Ross McNellis / Betty Chen vs Leigh Ann Zehnder / Erika Hjalseth6-2, 6-0
2023-05-06vs JTC-Lee-Jupiter Racquettes 2.5Lost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Chinn / Lucy Zhou vs Min Jin Lee / Muriel Wohrle6-7, 1-6
L#1 SinglesNicole Enslow vs Gina Wilkie0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBetty Chen / Jihui Han vs Liliana Cardenas / Jenna Caggiano2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-04-16vs SWW-GTC-KellyLost 01
L#1 SinglesNicole Enslow vs Samantha Blahnik6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-14vs TLTC-Crook-Love Hurts 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesNicole Enslow / Stephanie Chinn vs Leslie Artman / Karen Oie4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJihui Han vs Marit Berg2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1JTC-Lee-Jupiter Racquettes 2.5902438114
2SWW-GTC-Kelly54151227194
3TLTC-Crook-Love Hurts 2.536121533238
4LRC-Enslow1832449296

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Lucy Zhou
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Stephanie Chinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.18
Nicole Enslow
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jihui Han
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Ross McNellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Chinn + Nicole Enslow134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Ross McNellis + Lucy Zhou033 matchesnot enough data
Lucy Zhou + Nicole Enslow033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Lucy Zhou
29W–42L career · 2 lines in 2023
0%79%21%
2.40
2.5
Stephanie Chinn
29W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%98%2%
2.22
2.5
Nicole Enslow
18W–43L career · 9 lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.18
Jihui Han
1W–8L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Ross McNellis
3W–9L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.