Teams

You've Been Served

2025 Tri-Level League · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-10-06vs Tri-UsLost 12
L#1 DoublesCourtney O'Daniel / Kerin Parvin vs Pam Gandy / Julie Alvarez2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKirstin Clark / Shaun Rawlins vs Sara White / JESSICA Sills6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJennifer Jones / Christine Barton vs Kelly Grossman / Jen Haines3-6, 4-6
2024-10-05vs TerminettersLost 12
L#1 DoublesKerin Parvin / Virginia Kaklamani vs Christina Colwell / Casey Sutton6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesShaun Rawlins / Kirstin Clark vs Cynthia Pope / Maria Chase5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmanda Mays / Christine Barton vs Margaret Chavez / Mary Cirilo7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Joy Meltzer
published
4.22
Virginia Kaklamani
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.17
Pinky Cruz-Osterman
published
4.14
Kristen Fowler
published
4.14
Courtney O'Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Kirstin Clark
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.93
Allyson McCale
published 4
3.46
Monica Saenz-Vigil
published
3.45
Amanda Mays
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.44
Christine Barton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kerin Parvin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shaun Rawlins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirstin Clark + Allyson McCale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joy Meltzer
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
Virginia Kaklamani
13W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Pinky Cruz-Osterman
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
Kristen Fowler
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
4.5
Courtney O'Daniel
11W–11L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
Kirstin Clark
44W–18L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
4.06
4
Allyson McCale
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Amanda Stephenson
9W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Saenz-Vigil
27W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Amanda Mays
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.45
3.5
Christine Barton
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Kerin Parvin
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shaun Rawlins
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.