Teams

Callahan/JB/3Oaks

2024 Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Men - LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-20vs Biagioni/LR/ChenalLost 12
W#1 DoublesDon Threm / Charles Combs vs Doug Meyer / Dana Bennett6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMark Jumper / Stan Brummett vs Fred Brown / Doug Williams3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobert Lee / Barry Callahan vs Stephen Rowell / Pete Owens1-6, 2-6
2024-10-20vs Biagioni/LR/ChenalLost 12
L#1 DoublesDon Threm / Charles Combs vs John Myers / Kevin Dugan6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMark Jumper / Stan Brummett vs Pete Biagioni / Dana Bennett6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Lee / Jimmy Gaither vs Paul Bowersock / Elliot Esmaeilpour1-6, 2-6
2024-10-19vs Biagioni/LR/ChenalLost 12
W#1 DoublesDon Threm / Charles Combs vs John Myers / Doug Williams7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRobert Lee / Jimmy Gaither vs Pete Biagioni / Pete Owens3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Jumper / Stan Brummett vs Paul Bowersock / Kevin Dugan1-6, 4-6
2024-10-19vs Biagioni/LR/ChenalWon 21
W#1 DoublesDon Threm / Charles Combs vs Stephen Rowell / Elliot Esmaeilpour6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMark Jumper / Stan Brummett vs Doug Meyer / Doug Williams6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRobert Lee / Barry Callahan vs Fred Brown / Dana Bennett2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men - LOCAL LEAGUE AT STATE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Mark Jumper
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.81
Charles Combs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.53
Barry Callahan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.36
Jimmy Gaither
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Don Threm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stan Brummett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Jumper + Charles Combs2452% gamesnot enough data
Don Threm + Charles Combs314 matchesnot enough data
Mark Jumper + Stan Brummett224 matchesnot enough data
Barry Callahan + Jimmy Gaither033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Jumper
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Charles Combs
10W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Barry Callahan
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.53
Jimmy Gaither
0W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.36
Don Threm
9W–7L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stan Brummett
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.