Teams

CP:3.5 Legal to Serve (National):Eilertsen/Hoffman

2022 SCT Adult 18 & Over Women Summer · 3.5 Women - 4

18 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SOUTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-24vs CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/SwansonLost 13
L#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Euching Lin vs Judy Bloom / Jennifer Murphy6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAmy Lundy vs Anna Giordano3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Welch / Susan Carroll vs Ellen Leigh / Nyle Salley1-6, 6-5
W#3 DoublesMyrna Gardner / Anna Liu vs Emily Catto / Sylvia Swanson7-5, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMarisa Ehrlich-Siegel / Elizabeth Goldstein vs Tory Woodruff / Rebecca Soskin6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLee Wipper vs Monica Young2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Melissa Welch vs Jessica Holscott / Jennifer Forlizzi4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarjan Verhelst / Susan Carroll vs Shelby Smith / Jamie Behr1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Laurie Hoffman vs Mary Pasierb / Mary Wise6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLee Wipper vs Susan Luchars6-0, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMarjan Verhelst / TSU-CHUN TSUN vs Barbra Bell / Susanna Nichols4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMyrna Gardner / Flavia Lodato vs Meredith Edwards / Kerri Arnold6-2, 6-3
W#1 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Tracey Langlois vs Ann Horowitz / Emily Schwartz7-6, 5-4
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Goldstein vs Shannon Weber6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Amy Lundy vs Brenda Sanatar / Karen Malek6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarjan Verhelst / Suzette Harris vs Amanda Ansell / Annemarie Rothe7-6, 4-4
W#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel vs Susanna Nichols / Katherine Curtin4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesTSU-CHUN TSUN vs Susan Luchars6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLaurie Hoffman / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Heidi Smith / Jenelle Scanlon6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesFlavia Lodato / Myrna Gardner vs Brooke Sessions / Meredith Edwards7-6, 6-2
2022-06-05vs CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/SwansonSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMelissa Welch / TSU-CHUN TSUN vs Jennifer Murphy / Judy Bloom3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEuching Lin vs Jennifer Ward3-6, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Eilertsen / Sara Watts vs Christine Moore / Eileen Troise6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSuzette Harris / Michelle Li vs Andrea Fage / Sarah Roth7-6, 5-2
W#1 DoublesMarisa Ehrlich-Siegel / TSU-CHUN TSUN vs Millyn Gaaserud / Jennifer Forlizzi6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Goldstein vs Monica Young6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSara Watts / Marjorie Eilertsen vs Jessica Holscott / Shelby Smith6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichelle Li / Anna Liu vs Laura Cramer / Patricia Mallon5-7, 3-6
L#1 DoublesTracey Langlois / Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel vs Emily Schwartz / Lourdes Marti3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Watts / Laurie Hoffman vs Kimberly Gibbs / Kylie Burchell6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelissa Welch / Amy Lundy vs Cynthia Borcherding / Shannon Smith6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · 3.5 Women - 4
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Q - NC:Summer Aces:Campo/Simon0719924212
2WRC:RTL:Lieberson/Even0791941293
3CP:3.5 Legal to Serve (National):Eilertsen/Hoffman08221023250
4EBT:Ace Kickers:Bandak08211127268
5Q - 4S:Smash Hits:Amadeo/Margulies08201228239
6TRC:Smash Girls:Zwart/Tsichlas08181430274
7EBT:Love All:Kim/Ratcliffe08171531257
8OGT:Acing Gracefully:Matusow/Rothe08181433289
9Q - KH:Serves You Right:Woodruff/Smith08171533267
10MIT:Sorry, Not Sorry:Nava/Nolan08151739297
11WRC:Ace Balls:Spencer08131941301
12CP:Simply Smashing:Catto/Swanson08151742300
13MIT:Love'em & Leave'em Orban/Beilin08131942319
14Q - MIT:Jr. Lady Bulldogs:Dellacroce08112146331
15Q - KH:Glam Slam Summer 3.5:Harned0882451346
16CP:Hurricanes 18+ 3.5:Raman09201634300
17GS:Slice Girls:Pacheco09152143310
18Q - GRC:3.5:Leon/Auch010301021265
19KH:No Access:Sparagna010251538341
20CP:Topspinners:das Neves010142655367
21KH:Point Taken:Clarke010122860414

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Sara Watts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Marjorie Eilertsen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Laurie Hoffman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.77
Elizabeth Goldstein
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
TSU-CHUN TSUN
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.50
Susan Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Melissa Welch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.40
Flavia Lodato
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Marjan Verhelst
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Euching Lin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Anna Liu
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Amy Lundy
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Lee Wipper
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Michelle Li
published
Myrna Gardner
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Suzette Harris
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Langlois
usually #1 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjorie Eilertsen + Myrna Gardner11172% games+16.2% vs expected
Laurie Hoffman + Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel9070% games+10.7% vs expected
Marjorie Eilertsen + Sara Watts25958% games+7.9% vs expected
Laurie Hoffman + Marjorie Eilertsen7161% games+6.0% vs expected
Tracey Langlois + Marjorie Eilertsen2643% games+5.3% vs expected
TSU-CHUN TSUN + Tracey Langlois3351% games+5.3% vs expected
Tracey Langlois + Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel10262% games+4.8% vs expected
Susan Carroll + Marjorie Eilertsen314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Watts
108W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
Marjorie Eilertsen
132W–85L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Laurie Hoffman
279W–92L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Elizabeth Goldstein
34W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Marisa Ehrlich-Siegel
55W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
TSU-CHUN TSUN
146W–99L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
Susan Carroll
78W–56L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Melissa Welch
194W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Flavia Lodato
82W–52L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.40
Marjan Verhelst
56W–38L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Euching Lin
117W–66L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Anna Liu
37W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Amy Lundy
26W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
Lee Wipper
132W–168L career · 5 lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
2.98
Michelle Li
22W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Myrna Gardner
113W–93L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Suzette Harris
38W–29L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracey Langlois
107W–74L career · 13 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.