Teams

Paul Perry

2025 Adult 40&over-NE · Men 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-10vs Germain McConnellWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Duran / George Wolf vs James Cizdziel / John Browning7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesShane Turner vs Malcolm Roland1-0
W#2 DoublesShane Spees / Paul Perry vs Germain McConnell / MOZART DOR6-4, 6-4
2025-04-03vs Germain McConnellLost 12
L#1 DoublesGeorge Wolf / Michael Duran vs James Cizdziel / John Browning6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesShane Turner vs Brian Walkington1-0
W#2 DoublesShane Spees / Paul Perry vs MOZART DOR / Germain McConnell6-4, 6-4
2025-03-27vs Germain McConnellLost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn Edwards / Graydon Flowers vs James Cizdziel / Praveen Panickar6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesJason Ohler vs Jesse Cromwell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrad Neal / Damon Ladner vs Earl Bell III / Patrick Perry6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRuff Thomas / Richard Tucker vs John Browning / Malcolm Roland6-7, 6-7
2025-03-20vs Germain McConnellSplit 22
W#1 DoublesGraydon Flowers / John Edwards vs Praveen Panickar / James Cizdziel7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJason Ohler vs Jesse Cromwell2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrad Neal / Damon Ladner vs Earl Bell III / Patrick Perry7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesRuff Thomas / Richard Tucker vs Malcolm Roland / John Browning1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Graydon Flowers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Brad Neal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
George Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Michael Duran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Paul Perry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Damon Ladner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jason Ohler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Richard Tucker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Ruff Thomas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shane Spees
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shane Turner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Graydon Flowers
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Brad Neal
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
George Wolf
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Michael Duran
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Paul Perry
6W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3
Damon Ladner
17W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
2.76
Jason Ohler
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Tucker
2W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruff Thomas
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shane Spees
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shane Turner
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.