Teams

Baymeadows - Gray

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over

20 players · average NTRP 3.38 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-06vs Planet Swim - MorseWon 10
W#1 SinglesJill Gray vs Meghan Spencer7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-23vs Jax Beach Tennis Center - WatersLost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Gray / Cindy Wilkinson vs Rosemarie Prokop / Kelly Sams0-6, 3-6
2025-02-23vs Palencia - GaunttLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Gray vs Kim Peacock2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-09vs Jax Beach Tennis Center - WatersLost 01
L#2 DoublesDanijela Pope / Jill Gray vs Erin Wolf / Vandi Cole7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.70
Colleen Sheehan
published 3.5
3.45
Traunia Senior
published
3.45
Emily Silva
published
3.34
Jill Gray
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.34
Danijela Pope
published 3.5
3.33
Kelly Kuchera
published
3.33
Cara Binaco
published 3.5
Christina Ponich
published 3.5
3.21
Brenda Sy
published 3.5
3.17
Michelle Rawls
published
3.15
Stacey Hartley
published
3.14
Kim Costello
published
3.07
Oksana Andersen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Sherry Hutzler
published
2.98
Connie Rouls
published 3.5
2.94
Jody Glover
published
2.87
Deidra Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Cindy Wilkinson
published 3
2.63
Kelly Bryant
published
Elisabethe Lucien
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Colleen Sheehan
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.70
Traunia Senior
33W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.45
Emily Silva
20W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
Jill Gray
48W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
3.5
Danijela Pope
23W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Kelly Kuchera
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Cara Binaco
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Christina Ponich
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Brenda Sy
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Michelle Rawls
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Stacey Hartley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kim Costello
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Oksana Andersen
25W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.07
Sherry Hutzler
12W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3.5
Connie Rouls
1W–14L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Jody Glover
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.94
3
Deidra Johnson
5W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Cindy Wilkinson
14W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Kelly Bryant
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Elisabethe Lucien
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.