Teams

40 Love

2025 OKCAdult 40 & Over League · 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.86 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-21vs Team ChiltonsWon 31
W#1 DoublesAnne McKinney / Karen Orgill vs Maria Trapp-Braly / Kim Rengstorf6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Prince / Beth Jennings vs Jacqualine Bufford / Natica Smith2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAnnette Woodall / Dona Zanotti vs Sandy Grace / JENNIE PRICE6-2, 6-2
W#4 DoublesSusie Hurst / Robin Murray vs Leslie Ellen Venator / Miranda Kieffer6-4, 6-4
L#1 DoublesCarey Freeman / Karen Orgill vs Julie Walker / Erin Wood0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoanie Bonfield Dinneen / Susie Hurst vs Ava Nesbitt / Marisa New6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAnne McKinney / Dona Zanotti vs Kelly Callahan / Maria Rocha3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#4 DoublesLisa Prince / Beth Jennings vs Janet Allen / Elizabeth Hooper6-3, 6-4
2024-09-16vs Team ChiltonsWon 50
W#1 DoublesAnnette Woodall / Dona Zanotti vs Jacqualine Bufford / Natica Smith7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesMallory van Horn vs Heather Herndon6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNicole Fitzpatrick / Karen Orgill vs Leslie Ellen Venator / Miranda Kieffer6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBeth Jennings / Jolinda Holt vs Maricel Kuhn / Maria Trapp-Braly6-1, 6-1
W#4 DoublesKathy Corken / Robin Murray vs Tammy Rainey / Kim Rengstorf4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKimerlee Conner / Karen Orgill vs Ava Nesbitt / Linda Bahan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMallory van Horn vs Marlo Carr3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnne McKinney / Jolinda Holt vs Kelly Callahan / Julie Walker6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarey Freeman / Deanna Lynn Gier vs Marisa New / Maria Rocha0-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesDona Zanotti / Joanie Bonfield Dinneen vs Beth Henry / Erin Barnhart7-6, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Beth Jennings
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.83
Dona Zanotti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Susie Hurst
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Jolinda Holt
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.72
Michele Hill
published
3.70
Mallory van Horn
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Karen Orgill
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.63
Anne McKinney
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.52
Annette Woodall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.52
Lisa Prince
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Kathy Corken
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Kimerlee Conner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Carey Freeman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.41
Alice Dorris
published 3.5
3.33
Robin Murray
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Deanna Lynn Gier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Joanie Bonfield Dinneen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Nicole Fitzpatrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Vi Le
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Jennings + Lisa Prince5262% games+8.9% vs expected
Annette Woodall + Dona Zanotti6063% games+6.6% vs expected
Michele Hill + Jolinda Holt4162% games+5.4% vs expected
Annette Woodall + Susie Hurst311758% games+3.5% vs expected
Karen Orgill + Mallory van Horn4459% games+2.1% vs expected
Michele Hill + Anne McKinney11857% games+1.6% vs expected
Joanie Bonfield Dinneen + Dona Zanotti221056% games+1.4% vs expected
Dona Zanotti + Kimerlee Conner14658% games+1.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Jennings
57W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%28%
3.93
4
Dona Zanotti
163W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
Susie Hurst
53W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
Jolinda Holt
68W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Michele Hill
96W–56L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Mallory van Horn
85W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
Karen Orgill
73W–58L career · 4 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
4
Anne McKinney
82W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.63
4
Annette Woodall
61W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.52
Lisa Prince
55W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.52
Kathy Corken
46W–59L career · 1 line in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Kimerlee Conner
93W–182L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
4
Carey Freeman
82W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Alice Dorris
26W–42L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.41
Robin Murray
48W–64L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.33
3.5
Deanna Lynn Gier
21W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
Joanie Bonfield Dinneen
105W–76L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Fitzpatrick
55W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Vi Le
16W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.