Teams

Team Desai (CONFIRMED)

USTA Atlanta Summer - Combo Doubles 18 & Over Qualifier · 6.5 Men (Fowler Park)

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-09vs GA 6.5M 18 & Over (Mohammad Abdul)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDigvijay Sonawane / Soham Nathwani vs Srinivas Reddy Ravula / Vinilreddy Kesireddy8-9
L#2 DoublesAshokkumar Shanmugam / Mathew Varghese vs Imran Pasha Mohammad Abdul / Rama Krishna Makkena4-8
L#3 DoublesDharmendra Desai / Kevin Smith vs Rahmat Syed / Praveenkumar Ashokkumar0-8
2025-08-09vs Team Peacock (CONFIRMED)Won 21
L#1 DoublesMathew Varghese / Ashokkumar Shanmugam vs Tyson Kahle / Joseph Savoca6-8
W#2 DoublesKevin Smith / Sunny Sequeira vs Daniel Sarisky / Dave Beck8-6
W#3 DoublesSoham Nathwani / Digvijay Sonawane vs Troy Peacock / Alex Ivchenko8-4
2025-08-09vs Team Moyer (CONFIRMED)Won 21
W#1 DoublesMathew Varghese / Ashokkumar Shanmugam vs Cliff Chandler / Adam van Horn9-7
L#2 DoublesSunny Sequeira / Dharmendra Desai vs Marvin Wendorf / Raj Nadimpalli7-9
W#3 DoublesSoham Nathwani / Digvijay Sonawane vs OTTO MUTZBERG II / Keith Fouts9-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men (Fowler Park) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Ashokkumar Shanmugam
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Prasanna Vanguri
published
3.05
Mathew Varghese
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.95
Sunny Sequeira
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Digvijay Sonawane
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Dharmendra Desai
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Soham Nathwani
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mathew Varghese + Ashokkumar Shanmugam5361% games+15.9% vs expected
Prasanna Vanguri + Mathew Varghese213 matchesnot enough data
Soham Nathwani + Digvijay Sonawane213 matchesnot enough data
Mathew Varghese + Dharmendra Desai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashokkumar Shanmugam
14W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Prasanna Vanguri
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Mathew Varghese
12W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.05
Sunny Sequeira
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Digvijay Sonawane
5W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Dharmendra Desai
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.89
Soham Nathwani
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.