Teams

LMonty/JRuggiero (Palisades)

2026 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.31 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Christina Pardi vs Colette Wilkes / Nanci Weil6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Corinne McBrier6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrooke Kline / Lisa Monty vs Karin Britt / Phyllis Nussman0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJane Moncayo / Karen Davies vs Joan Carney / Molly Clune6-1, 6-3
2026-04-13vs LFerguson/RSmith (Piper Glen)Split 22
W#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Christina Pardi vs Cindy Rhoten / Laura Brandt6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Katie Bissett4-5
L#2 DoublesJane Moncayo / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Linda Hunley / Megan Francis4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDawn Houpt / Lisa Monty vs Katie Cronin / Joanne Joliet4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-04-06vs JJohnson/MDwyer (Carmel)Split 22
W#1 DoublesChristina Pardi / Nataliya Rubanenko vs Chelsea Rhodes / Lindsey Smith6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Kathryn Klaus6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBrooke Kline / Lisa Monty vs Jennifer Johnson / Molly Dwyer4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesJane Moncayo / Karen Davies vs Laurie Diman / SUSAN ALIOTA4-6, 3-6
2026-03-30vs OClaxton (Queens)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Lisa Strump vs Donna Musante / Paula Donoghue3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Naomi O'Brien6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBrooke Kline / Jane Moncayo vs Charmaine Gittens / Stephanie Stanton6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristina Pardi / Brittany Meehan vs Stacey Reinhardt / Kim Wojnowich3-6, 6-7
2026-03-26vs MOlsen/Nakai (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 SinglesNataliya Rubanenko vs Rachel Grantham2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBrooke Kline / Jane Moncayo vs Rachel Drees / Rosalie ORourke6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-23vs SChandler/Eggers (Raintree)Split 22
W#1 DoublesNataliya Rubanenko / Lisa Strump vs Niki Koesel / Mindy Zimmerman6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Karen Worley6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrittany Meehan / Stephanie Durovic vs Ciara McKiernan / Tricia Shaw4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDawn Houpt / Lisa Monty vs Stacy Andrews / Leigh Bellardini1-6, 4-6
2026-03-09vs KMacrone (Park Road)Split 22
L#1 DoublesBrittany Meehan / Stephanie Durovic vs Kathy Lucas / Connie Arevalo4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMayela Magur vs Zahide Marenic6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Houpt / Karen Davies vs Kim Gissy / Kimberley Pennington5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLisa Strump / Lisa Monty vs Bridget Megginson / Kate MacRone6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Christina Pardi
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.26
Jennifer Ruggiero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Brooke Kline
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Nataliya Rubanenko
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.08
Lisa Strump
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.06
Mayela Magur
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Lisa Monty
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Stephanie Durovic
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Brittany Meehan
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.93
Karen Davies
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
2.84
Jane Moncayo
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.75
Dawn Houpt
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nataliya Rubanenko + Lisa Strump7452% games+1.1% vs expected
Jane Moncayo + Jennifer Ruggiero1446% games−0.1% vs expected
Jane Moncayo + Mayela Magur8752% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Monty + Dawn Houpt7256% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Ruggiero + Nataliya Rubanenko1437% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Monty + Brooke Kline4158% gamesnot enough data
Jane Moncayo + Lisa Monty134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Houpt + Karen Davies224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Pardi
26W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Jennifer Ruggiero
38W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Brooke Kline
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Nataliya Rubanenko
35W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
3
Lisa Strump
32W–36L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Mayela Magur
133W–89L career · 6 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Lisa Monty
40W–22L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Stephanie Durovic
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Brittany Meehan
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Karen Davies
31W–34L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Jane Moncayo
48W–68L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Dawn Houpt
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.