Teams

Be.Koren40A

2026 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 4.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-14vs Gr.Kash40AWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Ruggieri / Jonathan Canon vs Michael McGuire / Chris Mann5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCasey Black vs Seb Heese0-1
W#2 DoublesAndrew Moretz / Max Stevenson vs Benjamin Moeller / Scott Underwood6-2, 6-3
2026-04-23vs Sa.Perian40AWon 31
W#1 DoublesJonathan Canon / Brad Burgess vs Charles Whitehorne / Sandeep Verghese5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesMax Stevenson vs Brett Compton4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMartin Green / Joe Ruggieri vs Praveen Krishnamurthy / Boyd Blackburn6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJonathan Hodges / Clay Garst vs Youngjun Lee / Joshua Ganeles6-1, 7-5
2026-04-16vs Al.Badulis40A4.5Split 22
L#1 DoublesJonathan Hodges / Brian Maher vs Carlos Garcia-Shelton / Tim Rufiange3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMax Stevenson vs Bradford Aron6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicolas Rose / Simon Cagle vs Alexander Kimball / Rocco Russo6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCraig Stone / Clay Garst vs Ted Hill / Praveen Chandrasekhar6-1, 3-0
2026-04-09vs Gr.Kash40AWon 40
W#1 DoublesChristopher Edwards / Craig Stone vs Michael McGuire / Benjamin Moeller6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJohn Preiss vs Seb Heese7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMax Stevenson / Jonathan Hodges vs Barry Mitchell / Gregory Kash6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesVictor Meir / Clay Garst vs Chris Mann / Walid Mustafa6-2, 6-2
2026-03-26vs Co.Sutler40AWon 21
L#1 DoublesClay Garst / Jonathan Hodges vs T Brandon Brown / Gary Caiola2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Edwards / Simon Cagle vs Scott Cruikshank / Tyler Priest6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCasey Black / Victor Meir vs Cody Sutler / Dylan DeMacy6-4, 7-5
2026-03-12vs Sa.Perian40AWon 40
W#1 DoublesNicolas Rose / Christopher Edwards vs Santha Perian / Praveen Krishnamurthy6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJohn Preiss vs Brett Compton7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBrian Maher / Clay Garst vs Joshua Ganeles / Youngjun Lee6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGuillermo Velarde / Simon Cagle vs Boyd Blackburn / Sandeep Verghese6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-05vs Al.Badulis40A4.5Won 31
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hodges / Brian Maher vs Praveen Chandrasekhar / Carlos Garcia-Shelton6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJohn Preiss vs Allan Badulis0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGuillermo Velarde / Nicolas Rose vs Tim Rufiange / Anthony Davis7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChristopher Edwards / Martin Green vs Thayer Morrill / Rocco Russo6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Be.Koren40A7022616185
2Sa.Perian40A52171124227
3Al.Badulis40A4.54319922197
4Gr.Kash40A1672144297
5Co.Sutler40A0632143277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Jonathan Hodges
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.32
Simon Cagle
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.31
Christopher Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
Jonathan Canon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.27
Nicolas Rose
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
Clay Garst
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.21
Martin Green
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.21
Casey Black
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.19
Andrew Moretz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Guillermo Velarde
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.14
Max Stevenson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.11
John Preiss
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.09
Craig Stone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.91
Benjamin Koren
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
Joe Ruggieri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Victor Meir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Hodges
13W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.40
4.5
Simon Cagle
102W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
4.32
4.5
Christopher Edwards
4W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
Jonathan Canon
102W–70L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
4.29
Nicolas Rose
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Clay Garst
4W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
Martin Green
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Casey Black
15W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Andrew Moretz
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
8%90%1%
4.19
Guillermo Velarde
9W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14
Max Stevenson
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.14
John Preiss
2W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Craig Stone
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.09
4
Benjamin Koren
9W–1L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
Joe Ruggieri
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Victor Meir
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.